Maulana Arshad Madani
The Uniform Civil Code has been implemented in Uttarakhand. Uttarakhand is the first state in the country to do so. However, Jamiat Ulama-e-Hind has expressed displeasure over this and has said to go to court. According to Jamiat Ulama-e-Hind, not only the religious freedom of the citizens has been attacked by implementing the Civil Code, but this law is completely based on discrimination and prejudice. Jamiat Ulama-e-Hind President Maulana Arshad Madni will challenge the decision in both Nainital High Court and Supreme Court.
The lawyers of Jamiat Ulama-e-Hind have intensively investigated the constitutional and legal aspects of this law. The organization believes that since this law is based on discrimination and prejudice, it cannot be called the Uniform Civil Code. Another important question arises whether a state government has the right to enact such a law.
Maulana Madani’s sharp response
On the decision of the state government to implement the Uniform Civil Code in Uttarakhand, Chairman Jamiat Ulama-e-Hind Maulana Arshad Madni reacted strong Can not compromise with your Sharia. He said that Scheduled Tribes have been exempted under Article 366, section 25 of the Indian Constitution in the Uniform Civil Code Act implemented in Uttarakhand and argued that their rights have been provided security under Article 21 of the Constitution.
Nainital will challenge the High Court and Supreme Court
Maulana Madani raised the question that if the Scheduled Tribes can be kept separate from this law under a section of the Constitution, then why can we not be given religious freedom under sections 25 and 26 of the Constitution, in which recognition of the fundamental rights of citizens Religious freedom has been guaranteed by giving. If this is the same civil code, then why this discrimination between citizens? He also said that our team has reviewed the legal aspects and Jamiat Ulama-e-Hind is going to challenge the decision simultaneously in the Nainital High Court and the Supreme Court.
Section 44 guidelines do not suggest
He said that Section 44 is presented as evidence to implement the Uniform Civil Code and it is propaganda that the Uniform Civil Code is said in the Constitution, while Section 44 is not the guideline, but a suggestion It is, but there is no mention of sections 25, 26 and 29 of the Constitution, in which religious freedom is guaranteed by accepting the basic rights of citizens.
Separate laws in many states
The sections of the IPC and CRPC here are also not the same in the whole country, its size in the states is transformed. The law of cow slaughter in the country is also not the same, the law is not applicable in five states. Regarding reservation in the country, the Supreme Court has fixed its limit 50 percent, but more than 50 percent reservation has been given in different states. He questioned that when the civil la is not one in the whole country, then why the emphasis on implementing a family La across the country? Our country is a multi-cultural and multi-religious country, this is also its specialty, so a law cannot run here. Those who support Section 44 by closing the eye, forget that under this stream it has also been given that liquor should be banned in the whole country, the gap between the rich poor should be abolished, the government Why don’t this work? Isn’t this necessary?
No differences between basic principles
Maulana Madani said that we want to make it clear that the family las of our people is not a law made by humans, it is made by the Quran and Hadith. There can be justice -judicial debate on this, but we have no differences on the basic principles. He also said that communal forces want to keep new emotional and religious issues in constant fear and chaos by raising new emotional and religious issues, but Muslims should not live in any kind of fear and anarchy.
The struggle will continue Jamiat Ulama-e-Hind
As long as there are judicial people in the country, Jamiat Ulama-e-Hind will continue its struggle against those forces, which is not only a major threat to the unity and integrity of the country but also to divide the society on the basis of discrimination. There are also people. He said that in the yeast of this country, love has not been involved for thousands of years, hatred can be called successful for some time, but we are sure that victory is to be of love.
Latest india news
