Sunday, 28 May, 2023
  • Latest News
    • India
    • Regional
    • World
  • Top News
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Technology
    • Mobile
    • Gadgets
    • Internet
  • More
    • Lifestyle
    • Health
    • Automobiles
    • Education
    • Viral News
    • Web Stories
AnyTV News
No Result
View All Result
  • Latest News
    • India
    • Regional
    • World
  • Top News
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Technology
    • Mobile
    • Gadgets
    • Internet
  • More
    • Lifestyle
    • Health
    • Automobiles
    • Education
    • Viral News
    • Web Stories
Hindi
  • Latest News
    • India
    • Regional
    • World
  • Top News
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Technology
    • Mobile
    • Gadgets
    • Internet
  • More
    • Lifestyle
    • Health
    • Automobiles
    • Education
    • Viral News
    • Web Stories
Hindi
No Result
View All Result
AnyTV News
  • Latest News
  • Top News
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Technology
  • Lifestyle
  • Health
  • Automobiles
  • Education
  • Viral News
  • Web Stories
Home Latest News India

Supreme Court’s important remark, said- wearing of Rudraksh cannot be compared with Hijab, Supreme Court’s important remark, said- wearing of Rudraksha cannot be compared with Hijab

by Amit Tripathi
07/09/2022
in India, Latest News
Reading Time: 2 mins read
0
A A
Supreme Court's important remark, said- wearing of Rudraksh cannot be compared with Hijab, Supreme Court's important remark, said- wearing of Rudraksha cannot be compared with Hijab

New Delhi. The hearing on the Karnataka hijab case lasted for about two hours in the court on the second day. During this, the court commented on the argument of a pro-hijab lawyer. The Supreme Court said that wearing a rudraksh or a cross cannot be compared with a hijab. Explaining the reason behind this, he said that those things are worn inside the clothes. In fact, earlier pro-hijab lawyer Devdat Kamat had said that there is no investigation of students wearing rudraksh or cross in Karnataka, but Muslim girls wearing hijab are being stopped forcibly. The court hearing lasted for about two hours.

The lawyer gave some such argument for the hijab

In the 2-hour hearing, the pro-hijab lawyer gave examples of countries like America, South Africa, Canada, England, France, Turkey, Austria for 1 hour. After this Kamat came to the Constitution of India and as soon as he started talking about it, Justice Hemant Gupta, who was presiding over the bench of the two judges present there, said in a mild manner, let’s finally come back to India. Apart from this, Devdutt Kamat, arguing for Hijba, said that personal liberty guaranteed under Article 19 of the Constitution can be violated when it is against law and order or morality. But girls wearing hijab is not against any of this. On this point of the lawyer, the court said that wearing hijab is not prohibited, but wearing it in school is forbidden. The reason behind this is that there is a dress code in all public places.

At the end of the hearing, a bench of Justices Hemant Gupta and Sudhanshu Dhulia said that it will be continued on the coming Thursday at 11.30 am. Earlier, when today’s hearing began, advocate Ejaz Maqbool had told the court that, “I have submitted a compilation of the main points said in all the 23 petitioners to the court. Apart from this, have also created a WhatsApp group and shared it with the lawyers.

New Delhi. The hearing on the Karnataka hijab case lasted for about two hours in the court on the second day. During this, the court commented on the argument of a pro-hijab lawyer. The Supreme Court said that wearing a rudraksh or a cross cannot be compared with a hijab. Explaining the reason behind this, he said that those things are worn inside the clothes. In fact, earlier pro-hijab lawyer Devdat Kamat had said that there is no investigation of students wearing rudraksh or cross in Karnataka, but Muslim girls wearing hijab are being stopped forcibly. The court hearing lasted for about two hours.

The lawyer gave some such argument for the hijab

In the 2-hour hearing, the pro-hijab lawyer gave examples of countries like America, South Africa, Canada, England, France, Turkey, Austria for 1 hour. After this Kamat came to the Constitution of India and as soon as he started talking about it, Justice Hemant Gupta, who was presiding over the bench of the two judges present there, said in a mild manner, let’s finally come back to India. Apart from this, Devdutt Kamat, arguing for Hijba, said that personal liberty guaranteed under Article 19 of the Constitution can be violated when it is against law and order or morality. But girls wearing hijab is not against any of this. On this point of the lawyer, the court said that wearing hijab is not prohibited, but wearing it in school is forbidden. The reason behind this is that there is a dress code in all public places.

At the end of the hearing, a bench of Justices Hemant Gupta and Sudhanshu Dhulia said that it will be continued on the coming Thursday at 11.30 am. Earlier, when today’s hearing began, advocate Ejaz Maqbool had told the court that, “I have submitted a compilation of the main points said in all the 23 petitioners to the court. Apart from this, have also created a WhatsApp group and shared it with the lawyers.

New Delhi. The hearing on the Karnataka hijab case lasted for about two hours in the court on the second day. During this, the court commented on the argument of a pro-hijab lawyer. The Supreme Court said that wearing a rudraksh or a cross cannot be compared with a hijab. Explaining the reason behind this, he said that those things are worn inside the clothes. In fact, earlier pro-hijab lawyer Devdat Kamat had said that there is no investigation of students wearing rudraksh or cross in Karnataka, but Muslim girls wearing hijab are being stopped forcibly. The court hearing lasted for about two hours.

The lawyer gave some such argument for the hijab

In the 2-hour hearing, the pro-hijab lawyer gave examples of countries like America, South Africa, Canada, England, France, Turkey, Austria for 1 hour. After this Kamat came to the Constitution of India and as soon as he started talking about it, Justice Hemant Gupta, who was presiding over the bench of the two judges present there, said in a mild manner, let’s finally come back to India. Apart from this, Devdutt Kamat, arguing for Hijba, said that personal liberty guaranteed under Article 19 of the Constitution can be violated when it is against law and order or morality. But girls wearing hijab is not against any of this. On this point of the lawyer, the court said that wearing hijab is not prohibited, but wearing it in school is forbidden. The reason behind this is that there is a dress code in all public places.

At the end of the hearing, a bench of Justices Hemant Gupta and Sudhanshu Dhulia said that it will be continued on the coming Thursday at 11.30 am. Earlier, when today’s hearing began, advocate Ejaz Maqbool had told the court that, “I have submitted a compilation of the main points said in all the 23 petitioners to the court. Apart from this, have also created a WhatsApp group and shared it with the lawyers.

New Delhi. The hearing on the Karnataka hijab case lasted for about two hours in the court on the second day. During this, the court commented on the argument of a pro-hijab lawyer. The Supreme Court said that wearing a rudraksh or a cross cannot be compared with a hijab. Explaining the reason behind this, he said that those things are worn inside the clothes. In fact, earlier pro-hijab lawyer Devdat Kamat had said that there is no investigation of students wearing rudraksh or cross in Karnataka, but Muslim girls wearing hijab are being stopped forcibly. The court hearing lasted for about two hours.

The lawyer gave some such argument for the hijab

In the 2-hour hearing, the pro-hijab lawyer gave examples of countries like America, South Africa, Canada, England, France, Turkey, Austria for 1 hour. After this Kamat came to the Constitution of India and as soon as he started talking about it, Justice Hemant Gupta, who was presiding over the bench of the two judges present there, said in a mild manner, let’s finally come back to India. Apart from this, Devdutt Kamat, arguing for Hijba, said that personal liberty guaranteed under Article 19 of the Constitution can be violated when it is against law and order or morality. But girls wearing hijab is not against any of this. On this point of the lawyer, the court said that wearing hijab is not prohibited, but wearing it in school is forbidden. The reason behind this is that there is a dress code in all public places.

At the end of the hearing, a bench of Justices Hemant Gupta and Sudhanshu Dhulia said that it will be continued on the coming Thursday at 11.30 am. Earlier, when today’s hearing began, advocate Ejaz Maqbool had told the court that, “I have submitted a compilation of the main points said in all the 23 petitioners to the court. Apart from this, have also created a WhatsApp group and shared it with the lawyers.

New Delhi. The hearing on the Karnataka hijab case lasted for about two hours in the court on the second day. During this, the court commented on the argument of a pro-hijab lawyer. The Supreme Court said that wearing a rudraksh or a cross cannot be compared with a hijab. Explaining the reason behind this, he said that those things are worn inside the clothes. In fact, earlier pro-hijab lawyer Devdat Kamat had said that there is no investigation of students wearing rudraksh or cross in Karnataka, but Muslim girls wearing hijab are being stopped forcibly. The court hearing lasted for about two hours.

The lawyer gave some such argument for the hijab

In the 2-hour hearing, the pro-hijab lawyer gave examples of countries like America, South Africa, Canada, England, France, Turkey, Austria for 1 hour. After this Kamat came to the Constitution of India and as soon as he started talking about it, Justice Hemant Gupta, who was presiding over the bench of the two judges present there, said in a mild manner, let’s finally come back to India. Apart from this, Devdutt Kamat, arguing for Hijba, said that personal liberty guaranteed under Article 19 of the Constitution can be violated when it is against law and order or morality. But girls wearing hijab is not against any of this. On this point of the lawyer, the court said that wearing hijab is not prohibited, but wearing it in school is forbidden. The reason behind this is that there is a dress code in all public places.

At the end of the hearing, a bench of Justices Hemant Gupta and Sudhanshu Dhulia said that it will be continued on the coming Thursday at 11.30 am. Earlier, when today’s hearing began, advocate Ejaz Maqbool had told the court that, “I have submitted a compilation of the main points said in all the 23 petitioners to the court. Apart from this, have also created a WhatsApp group and shared it with the lawyers.

New Delhi. The hearing on the Karnataka hijab case lasted for about two hours in the court on the second day. During this, the court commented on the argument of a pro-hijab lawyer. The Supreme Court said that wearing a rudraksh or a cross cannot be compared with a hijab. Explaining the reason behind this, he said that those things are worn inside the clothes. In fact, earlier pro-hijab lawyer Devdat Kamat had said that there is no investigation of students wearing rudraksh or cross in Karnataka, but Muslim girls wearing hijab are being stopped forcibly. The court hearing lasted for about two hours.

The lawyer gave some such argument for the hijab

In the 2-hour hearing, the pro-hijab lawyer gave examples of countries like America, South Africa, Canada, England, France, Turkey, Austria for 1 hour. After this Kamat came to the Constitution of India and as soon as he started talking about it, Justice Hemant Gupta, who was presiding over the bench of the two judges present there, said in a mild manner, let’s finally come back to India. Apart from this, Devdutt Kamat, arguing for Hijba, said that personal liberty guaranteed under Article 19 of the Constitution can be violated when it is against law and order or morality. But girls wearing hijab is not against any of this. On this point of the lawyer, the court said that wearing hijab is not prohibited, but wearing it in school is forbidden. The reason behind this is that there is a dress code in all public places.

At the end of the hearing, a bench of Justices Hemant Gupta and Sudhanshu Dhulia said that it will be continued on the coming Thursday at 11.30 am. Earlier, when today’s hearing began, advocate Ejaz Maqbool had told the court that, “I have submitted a compilation of the main points said in all the 23 petitioners to the court. Apart from this, have also created a WhatsApp group and shared it with the lawyers.

New Delhi. The hearing on the Karnataka hijab case lasted for about two hours in the court on the second day. During this, the court commented on the argument of a pro-hijab lawyer. The Supreme Court said that wearing a rudraksh or a cross cannot be compared with a hijab. Explaining the reason behind this, he said that those things are worn inside the clothes. In fact, earlier pro-hijab lawyer Devdat Kamat had said that there is no investigation of students wearing rudraksh or cross in Karnataka, but Muslim girls wearing hijab are being stopped forcibly. The court hearing lasted for about two hours.

The lawyer gave some such argument for the hijab

In the 2-hour hearing, the pro-hijab lawyer gave examples of countries like America, South Africa, Canada, England, France, Turkey, Austria for 1 hour. After this Kamat came to the Constitution of India and as soon as he started talking about it, Justice Hemant Gupta, who was presiding over the bench of the two judges present there, said in a mild manner, let’s finally come back to India. Apart from this, Devdutt Kamat, arguing for Hijba, said that personal liberty guaranteed under Article 19 of the Constitution can be violated when it is against law and order or morality. But girls wearing hijab is not against any of this. On this point of the lawyer, the court said that wearing hijab is not prohibited, but wearing it in school is forbidden. The reason behind this is that there is a dress code in all public places.

At the end of the hearing, a bench of Justices Hemant Gupta and Sudhanshu Dhulia said that it will be continued on the coming Thursday at 11.30 am. Earlier, when today’s hearing began, advocate Ejaz Maqbool had told the court that, “I have submitted a compilation of the main points said in all the 23 petitioners to the court. Apart from this, have also created a WhatsApp group and shared it with the lawyers.

New Delhi. The hearing on the Karnataka hijab case lasted for about two hours in the court on the second day. During this, the court commented on the argument of a pro-hijab lawyer. The Supreme Court said that wearing a rudraksh or a cross cannot be compared with a hijab. Explaining the reason behind this, he said that those things are worn inside the clothes. In fact, earlier pro-hijab lawyer Devdat Kamat had said that there is no investigation of students wearing rudraksh or cross in Karnataka, but Muslim girls wearing hijab are being stopped forcibly. The court hearing lasted for about two hours.

The lawyer gave some such argument for the hijab

In the 2-hour hearing, the pro-hijab lawyer gave examples of countries like America, South Africa, Canada, England, France, Turkey, Austria for 1 hour. After this Kamat came to the Constitution of India and as soon as he started talking about it, Justice Hemant Gupta, who was presiding over the bench of the two judges present there, said in a mild manner, let’s finally come back to India. Apart from this, Devdutt Kamat, arguing for Hijba, said that personal liberty guaranteed under Article 19 of the Constitution can be violated when it is against law and order or morality. But girls wearing hijab is not against any of this. On this point of the lawyer, the court said that wearing hijab is not prohibited, but wearing it in school is forbidden. The reason behind this is that there is a dress code in all public places.

At the end of the hearing, a bench of Justices Hemant Gupta and Sudhanshu Dhulia said that it will be continued on the coming Thursday at 11.30 am. Earlier, when today’s hearing began, advocate Ejaz Maqbool had told the court that, “I have submitted a compilation of the main points said in all the 23 petitioners to the court. Apart from this, have also created a WhatsApp group and shared it with the lawyers.

EDITOR'SPICK

New Parliament Building Inauguration LIVE: New Parliament House being inaugurated today, know here every moment’s updates

IPL 2023: Gujarat reached the final with Shubman Gill’s fast batting, will compete with CSK tomorrow for the trophy

Arvind Kejriwal support or opposition? Congress will decide on May 29

New Delhi. The hearing on the Karnataka hijab case lasted for about two hours in the court on the second day. During this, the court commented on the argument of a pro-hijab lawyer. The Supreme Court said that wearing a rudraksh or a cross cannot be compared with a hijab. Explaining the reason behind this, he said that those things are worn inside the clothes. In fact, earlier pro-hijab lawyer Devdat Kamat had said that there is no investigation of students wearing rudraksh or cross in Karnataka, but Muslim girls wearing hijab are being stopped forcibly. The court hearing lasted for about two hours.

The lawyer gave some such argument for the hijab

In the 2-hour hearing, the pro-hijab lawyer gave examples of countries like America, South Africa, Canada, England, France, Turkey, Austria for 1 hour. After this Kamat came to the Constitution of India and as soon as he started talking about it, Justice Hemant Gupta, who was presiding over the bench of the two judges present there, said in a mild manner, let’s finally come back to India. Apart from this, Devdutt Kamat, arguing for Hijba, said that personal liberty guaranteed under Article 19 of the Constitution can be violated when it is against law and order or morality. But girls wearing hijab is not against any of this. On this point of the lawyer, the court said that wearing hijab is not prohibited, but wearing it in school is forbidden. The reason behind this is that there is a dress code in all public places.

At the end of the hearing, a bench of Justices Hemant Gupta and Sudhanshu Dhulia said that it will be continued on the coming Thursday at 11.30 am. Earlier, when today’s hearing began, advocate Ejaz Maqbool had told the court that, “I have submitted a compilation of the main points said in all the 23 petitioners to the court. Apart from this, have also created a WhatsApp group and shared it with the lawyers.

New Delhi. The hearing on the Karnataka hijab case lasted for about two hours in the court on the second day. During this, the court commented on the argument of a pro-hijab lawyer. The Supreme Court said that wearing a rudraksh or a cross cannot be compared with a hijab. Explaining the reason behind this, he said that those things are worn inside the clothes. In fact, earlier pro-hijab lawyer Devdat Kamat had said that there is no investigation of students wearing rudraksh or cross in Karnataka, but Muslim girls wearing hijab are being stopped forcibly. The court hearing lasted for about two hours.

The lawyer gave some such argument for the hijab

In the 2-hour hearing, the pro-hijab lawyer gave examples of countries like America, South Africa, Canada, England, France, Turkey, Austria for 1 hour. After this Kamat came to the Constitution of India and as soon as he started talking about it, Justice Hemant Gupta, who was presiding over the bench of the two judges present there, said in a mild manner, let’s finally come back to India. Apart from this, Devdutt Kamat, arguing for Hijba, said that personal liberty guaranteed under Article 19 of the Constitution can be violated when it is against law and order or morality. But girls wearing hijab is not against any of this. On this point of the lawyer, the court said that wearing hijab is not prohibited, but wearing it in school is forbidden. The reason behind this is that there is a dress code in all public places.

At the end of the hearing, a bench of Justices Hemant Gupta and Sudhanshu Dhulia said that it will be continued on the coming Thursday at 11.30 am. Earlier, when today’s hearing began, advocate Ejaz Maqbool had told the court that, “I have submitted a compilation of the main points said in all the 23 petitioners to the court. Apart from this, have also created a WhatsApp group and shared it with the lawyers.

New Delhi. The hearing on the Karnataka hijab case lasted for about two hours in the court on the second day. During this, the court commented on the argument of a pro-hijab lawyer. The Supreme Court said that wearing a rudraksh or a cross cannot be compared with a hijab. Explaining the reason behind this, he said that those things are worn inside the clothes. In fact, earlier pro-hijab lawyer Devdat Kamat had said that there is no investigation of students wearing rudraksh or cross in Karnataka, but Muslim girls wearing hijab are being stopped forcibly. The court hearing lasted for about two hours.

The lawyer gave some such argument for the hijab

In the 2-hour hearing, the pro-hijab lawyer gave examples of countries like America, South Africa, Canada, England, France, Turkey, Austria for 1 hour. After this Kamat came to the Constitution of India and as soon as he started talking about it, Justice Hemant Gupta, who was presiding over the bench of the two judges present there, said in a mild manner, let’s finally come back to India. Apart from this, Devdutt Kamat, arguing for Hijba, said that personal liberty guaranteed under Article 19 of the Constitution can be violated when it is against law and order or morality. But girls wearing hijab is not against any of this. On this point of the lawyer, the court said that wearing hijab is not prohibited, but wearing it in school is forbidden. The reason behind this is that there is a dress code in all public places.

At the end of the hearing, a bench of Justices Hemant Gupta and Sudhanshu Dhulia said that it will be continued on the coming Thursday at 11.30 am. Earlier, when today’s hearing began, advocate Ejaz Maqbool had told the court that, “I have submitted a compilation of the main points said in all the 23 petitioners to the court. Apart from this, have also created a WhatsApp group and shared it with the lawyers.

New Delhi. The hearing on the Karnataka hijab case lasted for about two hours in the court on the second day. During this, the court commented on the argument of a pro-hijab lawyer. The Supreme Court said that wearing a rudraksh or a cross cannot be compared with a hijab. Explaining the reason behind this, he said that those things are worn inside the clothes. In fact, earlier pro-hijab lawyer Devdat Kamat had said that there is no investigation of students wearing rudraksh or cross in Karnataka, but Muslim girls wearing hijab are being stopped forcibly. The court hearing lasted for about two hours.

The lawyer gave some such argument for the hijab

In the 2-hour hearing, the pro-hijab lawyer gave examples of countries like America, South Africa, Canada, England, France, Turkey, Austria for 1 hour. After this Kamat came to the Constitution of India and as soon as he started talking about it, Justice Hemant Gupta, who was presiding over the bench of the two judges present there, said in a mild manner, let’s finally come back to India. Apart from this, Devdutt Kamat, arguing for Hijba, said that personal liberty guaranteed under Article 19 of the Constitution can be violated when it is against law and order or morality. But girls wearing hijab is not against any of this. On this point of the lawyer, the court said that wearing hijab is not prohibited, but wearing it in school is forbidden. The reason behind this is that there is a dress code in all public places.

At the end of the hearing, a bench of Justices Hemant Gupta and Sudhanshu Dhulia said that it will be continued on the coming Thursday at 11.30 am. Earlier, when today’s hearing began, advocate Ejaz Maqbool had told the court that, “I have submitted a compilation of the main points said in all the 23 petitioners to the court. Apart from this, have also created a WhatsApp group and shared it with the lawyers.

New Delhi. The hearing on the Karnataka hijab case lasted for about two hours in the court on the second day. During this, the court commented on the argument of a pro-hijab lawyer. The Supreme Court said that wearing a rudraksh or a cross cannot be compared with a hijab. Explaining the reason behind this, he said that those things are worn inside the clothes. In fact, earlier pro-hijab lawyer Devdat Kamat had said that there is no investigation of students wearing rudraksh or cross in Karnataka, but Muslim girls wearing hijab are being stopped forcibly. The court hearing lasted for about two hours.

The lawyer gave some such argument for the hijab

In the 2-hour hearing, the pro-hijab lawyer gave examples of countries like America, South Africa, Canada, England, France, Turkey, Austria for 1 hour. After this Kamat came to the Constitution of India and as soon as he started talking about it, Justice Hemant Gupta, who was presiding over the bench of the two judges present there, said in a mild manner, let’s finally come back to India. Apart from this, Devdutt Kamat, arguing for Hijba, said that personal liberty guaranteed under Article 19 of the Constitution can be violated when it is against law and order or morality. But girls wearing hijab is not against any of this. On this point of the lawyer, the court said that wearing hijab is not prohibited, but wearing it in school is forbidden. The reason behind this is that there is a dress code in all public places.

At the end of the hearing, a bench of Justices Hemant Gupta and Sudhanshu Dhulia said that it will be continued on the coming Thursday at 11.30 am. Earlier, when today’s hearing began, advocate Ejaz Maqbool had told the court that, “I have submitted a compilation of the main points said in all the 23 petitioners to the court. Apart from this, have also created a WhatsApp group and shared it with the lawyers.

New Delhi. The hearing on the Karnataka hijab case lasted for about two hours in the court on the second day. During this, the court commented on the argument of a pro-hijab lawyer. The Supreme Court said that wearing a rudraksh or a cross cannot be compared with a hijab. Explaining the reason behind this, he said that those things are worn inside the clothes. In fact, earlier pro-hijab lawyer Devdat Kamat had said that there is no investigation of students wearing rudraksh or cross in Karnataka, but Muslim girls wearing hijab are being stopped forcibly. The court hearing lasted for about two hours.

The lawyer gave some such argument for the hijab

In the 2-hour hearing, the pro-hijab lawyer gave examples of countries like America, South Africa, Canada, England, France, Turkey, Austria for 1 hour. After this Kamat came to the Constitution of India and as soon as he started talking about it, Justice Hemant Gupta, who was presiding over the bench of the two judges present there, said in a mild manner, let’s finally come back to India. Apart from this, Devdutt Kamat, arguing for Hijba, said that personal liberty guaranteed under Article 19 of the Constitution can be violated when it is against law and order or morality. But girls wearing hijab is not against any of this. On this point of the lawyer, the court said that wearing hijab is not prohibited, but wearing it in school is forbidden. The reason behind this is that there is a dress code in all public places.

At the end of the hearing, a bench of Justices Hemant Gupta and Sudhanshu Dhulia said that it will be continued on the coming Thursday at 11.30 am. Earlier, when today’s hearing began, advocate Ejaz Maqbool had told the court that, “I have submitted a compilation of the main points said in all the 23 petitioners to the court. Apart from this, have also created a WhatsApp group and shared it with the lawyers.

New Delhi. The hearing on the Karnataka hijab case lasted for about two hours in the court on the second day. During this, the court commented on the argument of a pro-hijab lawyer. The Supreme Court said that wearing a rudraksh or a cross cannot be compared with a hijab. Explaining the reason behind this, he said that those things are worn inside the clothes. In fact, earlier pro-hijab lawyer Devdat Kamat had said that there is no investigation of students wearing rudraksh or cross in Karnataka, but Muslim girls wearing hijab are being stopped forcibly. The court hearing lasted for about two hours.

The lawyer gave some such argument for the hijab

In the 2-hour hearing, the pro-hijab lawyer gave examples of countries like America, South Africa, Canada, England, France, Turkey, Austria for 1 hour. After this Kamat came to the Constitution of India and as soon as he started talking about it, Justice Hemant Gupta, who was presiding over the bench of the two judges present there, said in a mild manner, let’s finally come back to India. Apart from this, Devdutt Kamat, arguing for Hijba, said that personal liberty guaranteed under Article 19 of the Constitution can be violated when it is against law and order or morality. But girls wearing hijab is not against any of this. On this point of the lawyer, the court said that wearing hijab is not prohibited, but wearing it in school is forbidden. The reason behind this is that there is a dress code in all public places.

At the end of the hearing, a bench of Justices Hemant Gupta and Sudhanshu Dhulia said that it will be continued on the coming Thursday at 11.30 am. Earlier, when today’s hearing began, advocate Ejaz Maqbool had told the court that, “I have submitted a compilation of the main points said in all the 23 petitioners to the court. Apart from this, have also created a WhatsApp group and shared it with the lawyers.

New Delhi. The hearing on the Karnataka hijab case lasted for about two hours in the court on the second day. During this, the court commented on the argument of a pro-hijab lawyer. The Supreme Court said that wearing a rudraksh or a cross cannot be compared with a hijab. Explaining the reason behind this, he said that those things are worn inside the clothes. In fact, earlier pro-hijab lawyer Devdat Kamat had said that there is no investigation of students wearing rudraksh or cross in Karnataka, but Muslim girls wearing hijab are being stopped forcibly. The court hearing lasted for about two hours.

The lawyer gave some such argument for the hijab

In the 2-hour hearing, the pro-hijab lawyer gave examples of countries like America, South Africa, Canada, England, France, Turkey, Austria for 1 hour. After this Kamat came to the Constitution of India and as soon as he started talking about it, Justice Hemant Gupta, who was presiding over the bench of the two judges present there, said in a mild manner, let’s finally come back to India. Apart from this, Devdutt Kamat, arguing for Hijba, said that personal liberty guaranteed under Article 19 of the Constitution can be violated when it is against law and order or morality. But girls wearing hijab is not against any of this. On this point of the lawyer, the court said that wearing hijab is not prohibited, but wearing it in school is forbidden. The reason behind this is that there is a dress code in all public places.

At the end of the hearing, a bench of Justices Hemant Gupta and Sudhanshu Dhulia said that it will be continued on the coming Thursday at 11.30 am. Earlier, when today’s hearing began, advocate Ejaz Maqbool had told the court that, “I have submitted a compilation of the main points said in all the 23 petitioners to the court. Apart from this, have also created a WhatsApp group and shared it with the lawyers.

ShareTweetShareSendSend

Related Posts

pm modi with sengol

New Parliament Building Inauguration LIVE: New Parliament House being inaugurated today, know here every moment’s updates

28/05/2023
3

IPL 2023: Gujarat reached the final with Shubman Gill’s fast batting, will compete with CSK tomorrow for the trophy

28/05/2023
1
Arvind Kejriwal support or opposition?  Congress will decide on May 29

Arvind Kejriwal support or opposition? Congress will decide on May 29

28/05/2023
6
Shah Rukh Khan described the new Parliament House as the 'new home of hopes', touched the heart by giving his voice to the video

Shah Rukh Khan described the new Parliament House as the ‘new home of hopes’, touched the heart by giving his voice to the video

28/05/2023
4

Recent Posts

  • New Parliament Building Inauguration LIVE: New Parliament House being inaugurated today, know here every moment’s updates
  • IPL 2023: Gujarat reached the final with Shubman Gill’s fast batting, will compete with CSK tomorrow for the trophy
  • Arvind Kejriwal support or opposition? Congress will decide on May 29

Categories

  • Automobiles
  • Business
  • DIY
  • Education
  • Entertainment
  • Gadgets
  • Health
  • India
  • Internet
  • Latest News
  • Lifestyle
  • Mobile
  • Opinion
  • Politics
  • Regional
  • Sports
  • Technology
  • Top News
  • Uncategorized
  • Viral News
  • World
  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
  • Contact Us

© 2023 AnyTV News

No Result
View All Result
  • Latest News
    • India
    • Regional
    • World
  • Top News
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Technology
    • Mobile
    • Gadgets
    • Internet
  • Lifestyle
  • Health
  • Automobiles
  • Education
  • Viral News
  • Web Stories

© 2023 AnyTV News

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.
Go to mobile version