New Delhi. The Varanasi Court on Monday (September 12) ruled in favor of the Hindu side, dismissing the petition of the Muslim parties in the Gyanvapi case. District Judge Dr Ajay Krishna Vishwesh has heard the petition of the Hindu side under 7 rule number 11. On the other hand, the petition of the Muslim side has been rejected. After which the Muslim side has said to go to the higher court. On which the Hindu side also said that if the doors of the Supreme Court are approached by the Muslim side, then the Hindu parties will also approach the court. Now the next hearing of the case has been fixed on September 22.
At present, the first challenge before the court was to decide whether this petition is maintainable or not. Since the petition of the Hindu parties should be dismissed on behalf of the Muslim parties citing the Place of Worship Act, since the petition of the Hindu parties is a gross violation of the Place of Worship Act. The Muslim parties said that if viewed from the prism of the Place of Worship Act, the petition of the Hindu side is not maintainable, but the court rejected these arguments of the Muslim side and ruled in favor of the Hindu side. Now after reading all these phenomena, two questions arise in the mind of the people that what are the Place of Warshif Act and 7 Rule No. . Let us know in more detail.
7 rule number 11
Actually, before understanding this rule, you have to understand that the Muslim side had to say in the context of the petition of the Hindu parties that it was not maintainable, so it should be dismissed, in view of which the first challenge before the court was That it should be decided whether this petition is worth hearing or not. Meanwhile, the court has considered the petition of the Hindu side worthy of hearing under 7 rule number 11. The court has now agreed to hear the petition of the Hindu side. On the other hand, the petition of the Muslim side has been dismissed. Along with this, the court has also termed the Place of Worship Act ineffective in this case.
Place of Worship Act
There is a lot of discussion about the Place of Worship Act during the court hearing in this entire Gyanvapi case. In fact, the Muslim side had initially rejected the petition of the Hindu side citing the Place of Worship Act. What is this Place of Worship Act? Actually, this act was brought by the Narasimha Rao government in the year 1991. Under this, whatever religious places are there after 1947, they should be allowed to remain the same. No change shall be made therein, but if it is done in spite of this, then it will be deemed to be a violation of the Place of Worship Act and for doing so shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, and with fine, or with both. Let us tell you that this act was brought by the then PV Narasimha Rao government keeping in mind the Ram temple movement. At the same time, during the hearing of the Gyanvapi case, there is a lot of discussion about the said Act.
What is the argument of Muslim side
On the other hand, Muslim parties are now referring to the Place of Worship Act in the Gyanvapi case as well. The Muslim side says that under the Place of Worship Act, no tampering can be done with the structure of the Gyanvapi Masjid, but today the court rejected all these arguments presented by the Muslim parties. Gone.