Where there is no domination of any other non-Hindu people residing in any area of Hindustan or outside, where our sovereignty, that is, the effect of Hindutva, can be established, at the same time it will be the only self-government of Hindus. Some Englishmen are English (Hindustani) because of their birth in Hindustan, but is it possible to call the dominance of these Anglo-Indians as self-government of Hindus? Aurangzeb and Tipu were born Hindus; Apart from this, he was the son of converted Hindu mothers, but because of this reason the kingdom of Aurangzeb or Tipu became the self-government of the Hindus? Absolutely not. So Shivaji, Guru Gobind Singh, Rana Pratap and Peshwa etc. had to establish the self-rule of the Hindus in a realistic way while fighting.
Therefore, in the present stage, if we consider ‘English National State’, then it will only mean that Muslim minorities residing in Hindustan will get equal civil rights and will get rights in civil life according to numbers. The just rights of any non-Hindu minority will not be encroached upon by majority Hindus, but Hindus will not relinquish the power they enjoy being the majority, in accordance with democracy and justice.
The Muslims being a minority cannot in any way be considered a favor done to the Hindus. Therefore, they should be satisfied, taking their fair share of political, civil rights. It is completely wrong to call this event Swarajya by giving just rights to the majority and the right not to accept power to the minorities.
The only thing we Hindus want is to establish our own ownership in our country. The name of our country should always be called Hindustan. Names like Aryavarta, Bharatbhoomi etc. will be dear to the cultured people. It is not our intention to encroach upon or defame our non-Hindu country-brothers by insisting that our motherland should be addressed as Hindustan. The Parsis and the Christian countrymen are still so culturally similar to us, so patriotic and the Anglo Indians so intelligent that they will not refuse to agree to the just role of the Hindus.
Our Muslim countrymen should feel satisfaction in being called Hindustani Muslim while guiding us from national and regional point of view. While doing so, their religious and cultural independent existence is not hindered in the slightest. Muslims have been calling this country as Hindustan. But rejecting these things, some fanatical Muslims do not accept the name of this country; But because of this, there is no need for us to become self-confessed by giving up our conscience. (Then there was no partition of India.) The name Hindustan has become the norm for our motherland. Hindus should not be prepared to break or dissuade from the unbroken tradition that is expressed by this name of motherland from the Rigveda period Sindhu to the Hindu word of our generation.
As the country of Germans, England of British, Turksthan of Turks and Afghanistan of Afghans, in the same way, Hindustan being the country of Hindus, we should mark our place permanently in the world map by this name itself.
(Excerpted from Hindu Rashtra Darshan)