Karishma Kapoor’s ex -husband Sanjay Kapoor died suddenly on 12 June. The businessmen were playing polo in London, when he allegedly suffered a heart attack. Now there is a tussle over his assets of 30 thousand crores, who is its real owner and how much amount will come in its part.
Mother wrote a letter
Karishma has two children Qian and Adhara from Sanjay Kapoor. In addition, his third wife Priya is also a child from Sachdeva. At the same time, Sanjay Kapoor’s mother has added more spices to it. Actually, he has written a letter that has brought a new twist in the will. His mother Rani Kapoor has written a letter to the stakeholders of Sona BLW Program forgings (Sona Commentar) in which he has expressed concern and said that in the month of June, he has been pressurizing him since the sudden death of his son and an attempt is being made to grab his heritage.
How much is Karishma Kapoor’s share?
Now sources close to the family have once again made it clear that Karishma has no interference or stake in her ex -husband’s property matters. There were discussions for a long time that Karishma was also asking for a share in the will of her ex -husband. But now it is clear that there is nothing like this. Sources further claimed that Karishma had nothing to do with any property. However, Karishma’s children are the real heirs of the late businessman’s property and they will get their rights.
Divorce was divorced in the year 2016
It is being said that Karishma’s entire focus is on the good of her children at the moment. Let us tell you that Karishma and Sanjay got married in a grand ceremony in 2003. However, the matter did not happen and both of them applied for divorce by mutual consent in 2014. His divorce was finalized in 2016.
What is the whole matter?
In 2016, Karishma filed a domestic violence case against Sanjay and her mother Rani Kapoor. As the chairman of the $ 3.6 billion Gold Comstetar Group, he has left assets worth more than Rs 30,000 crore behind him. Prior to the annual meeting of Sona Commentar, Sanjay’s mother issued a public statement claiming that she had a major stake in the group and hence she is a legal heir to the property.
