Supreme Court
The central government may file a review petition for the Supreme Court’s decision to set a time limit for the President and the Governors to approve the bills passed by the state assemblies. The government believes that some points in the decision may affect the jurisdiction of the executive. Officials gave this information on Sunday. However, he said that no decision has been taken yet.
There will be discussion about filing a review petition
According to officials, apart from the demand for a review of the deadline, the government may demand a review of the order of the Supreme Court, according to which if the President does not approve the bill sent by the Governor for consideration, the state governments can directly knock the court. On the condition of anonymity, an official said, “No decision has been taken yet, but the review petition is being considered.” The officer did not state the deadline for filing a review petition. The second official said that there is still to be discussed on the basis of review.
In which case the Supreme Court gave the verdict?
In a judgment last week, the Supreme Court determined that the President should take a decision on the bills reserved by the Governor within a period of three months from the date on which such reference is received. After the verdict, the Tamil Nadu government notified 10 Acts in the government gazette citing the Supreme Court’s decision, according to which they have received approval. The Supreme Court also approved 10 Bills, which were stopped by Tamil Nadu Governor RN Ravi for the President’s view.
According to the 415 -page decision uploaded on the Supreme Court website on Friday night, the court has set a month -long deadline to all governors to take action on the bills passed by the state assemblies. The Supreme Court said, “We consider it appropriate to adopt the time limit set by the Ministry of Home Affairs and determine that the President is required to take a decision on the bills reserved by the Governor within a period of 3 months on the date of 3 months, the day such a reference has been received. In case of any delay, in case of any delay, the reasonable reasons have to be recorded and the state will have to be told. The states must be supported and the state must also be supported and the government must also support the questions that can be supported and the government must The suggestions made by should be considered quickly. ”
The Supreme Court rejected the decision to reserve 10 Bills for the President’s view in the second phase, calling him illegal and lawful in terms of law. The court said, “Where the Governor reserves the bill for the view of the President and the President does not give his consent to it, then the state government will have the right to take such action before this court.”
What does the central government say?
The Central Government, especially in which the Supreme Court has said that if the Governor sends a bill to the President and the President does not take any decision on it, the state government can talk directly to the President. The government feels that this rule is not correct and it can cause confusion. Therefore, the government is preparing to file a review petition in the Supreme Court.
Also read-
‘BJP government in India, torture’, Muslim card was played in US court to stop Rana’s extradition
Latest india news
