New Delhi. Recently, there was a military struggle between India and Pakistan. During this time there was a lot of uproar that Pakistan killed many Rafale fighter aircraft of India. In India too, all the leaders of the opposition, including Rahul Gandhi, asked the government, how many Rafale fighters were destroyed in military conflict with Pakistan? The Modi government and the Indian Air Force did not answer questions about the demolition of Rafale fighter jets. The Indian Air Force said that this information can benefit the enemy. Now Eric Trappier, CEO of Dassao Aviation, a French company that makes Rafale fighter aircraft, has given information about this.
Eric Trappier, CEO of Dassaur Aviation, has claimed that no Rafale fighter aircraft of India was destroyed in military conflict with Pakistan.
In an interview given to French website ‘Avian De Chase’, CEO of Dassao Aviation, who manufactures Rafale fighter aircraft, claimed that no Rafale fighter aircraft of India was destroyed in a struggle with Pakistan. Eric Trappier has told the website that a Rafale aircraft was flying at height and during that time it got technical disturbances. Because of which that Rafale fighter aircraft of the Indian Air Force crashed. This Rafael did not crash during military conflict with Pakistan. The CEO of Dassau Aviation said that the Rafale fighter aircraft crashed is being investigated in the case of technical disturbances.
At the same time, India’s Defense Secretary RK Singh, in a conversation with news channel CNBC TV-18, has denied those claims that Pakistan killed many Rafale fighter jets in India. The Defense Secretary said on the question asked about this that he can assure that this is not true. He said that Pakistan has suffered more in military conflict than India. Earlier, the Associated Press reported that China and Pakistan spread lies about Rafale fighter jets, citing French intelligence report. So that other countries buy a Chinese fighter aircraft instead of Rafael. However, China has called this charge as sheer wrong.
