Bhopal. The Madhya Pradesh High Court has canceled the order of the collector stopping an entry into the border of Umaria and her other neighboring districts for one year. In the trial of Munni alias Madhuri Tiwari vs State Government and others, High Court Justice Vivek Aggarwal termed the order for the woman to be district for one year and said that it seems that these orders have been given due to other compulsions instead of meeting the needs of the law. The Madhya Pradesh High Court also imposed a fine of 25 thousand on the state government in this case. The collector of Umaria will have to pay this fine.
Justice Vivek Aggarwal of Madhya Pradesh High Court has ordered the Collector to pay the fine.
Justice Vivek Aggarwal, while hearing the woman’s petition, said that it seems to be an attempt to limit the independence of a person from the powerful state. The court said that it is clear that the Collector of Umaria ordered the provision given in Section 5 (B) of Madhya Pradesh State Security Act 1990. Justice Aggarwal said that it seems that the order of expulsion has been issued only on some other obligations besides the requirements of the law. The court said that the Madan Lal Marawi case is absolutely clear. This does not assure the survival of any material to meet the needs of Section 5 (A) and 5 (B) of the law.
The Madhya Pradesh High Court also said that the order passed by the Collector of Umaria and the District Magistrate on 21.10.2024 (Annex P-4) and the Divisional Commissioner, Shahdol Division, Shahdol, dated 20.01.2025 (Annex P-9) are mysterious and meditation. Hence they are canceled. The state will bear the cost of this case. The amount of which is 25 thousand rupees. In seven days, Justice Vivek Aggarwal ordered the woman to give this amount to the woman. The petitioner woman moved the High Court following the order of the Collector. The order of the collector of Umaria was confirmed by the Divisional Commissioner.
The petitioner’s counsel told the court that the list of only 6 cases against his client has been shown pending. Out of which 2 cases are section 110 (protection for good behavior from habitual criminals), 2 cases section 294 (pornographic acts and lyrics), 323 (punishment for voluntarily hurt), 506 (sentenced for criminal intimidation), 34 (general intent) and 2 other cases are under the provision of NDPS Act. The petitioner woman from the Madhya Pradesh High Court said that she has not been convicted in any case. At the same time, a counsel for the Madhya Pradesh government said that in view of the criminal activities of the petitioner, it was ordered to be District Budh after considering Section 5 (A) and 5 (B) of the Madhya Pradesh State Security Act.
