New Delhi. Public interest litigation demanding the Judicial Commission, under the chairmanship of the retired judge of the Supreme Court, was rejected by the country’s largest court. Justice Suryakant and Justice N. A bench of Kotishwar Singh also reprimanded the petitioner. The court said that such petitions should not be filed by filing the morale of the security forces. Justice Suryakant told the petitioner’s counsel that this time is not to file a petition. Justice Suryakanth said that when did we have been experts in such cases, how can the High Court or Supreme Court judge be experts in defense cases? The court said that our job is to settle disputes.
On the strict stance of the court, the petitioner said that he was withdrawing his application and came to court for students. On this, the Supreme Court turned back and said that there is not a single prayer for the students in your application. The Supreme Court warned to avoid filing such petitions. You want to investigate the retired judge of the Supreme Court. Understand the seriousness of the case. The bench said that this is a difficult time for every citizen. Understand the exaggeration of time. When the petitioner asked to withdraw the application, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta demanded from the bench that he should be stopped from the High Court J.
26 people died in a terrible terrorist attack on April 22 in Basaron Valley of Pahalgam. 17 people were injured in this incident. Investigation has been given to the country’s premiere agency NIA in Pahalgam. At the same time, the army and other security forces have been given the responsibility of hiding the culprits of this attack. It has already been revealed that one of the attackers is a former commando of Pakistan’s army. At least one of the terrorists killing tourists in Pahalgam is at least one local.
