New Delhi. The Constitution Bench headed by Chief Justice BR Gawai in the Supreme Court on Tuesday recited Kerala and Tamil Nadu governments. The governments of Kerala and Tamil Nadu had applied in the Supreme Court against the President’s opinion from the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court asked the question on the application of Kerala and Tamil Nadu, if the President wants Rai, what is wrong with it?
The President has sent 14 questions to the Supreme Court under Article 143 of the Constitution and sought an opinion. In fact, the bench of Justice JB Pardiwala of the Supreme Court ruled on April 2025 that the governors and the President would have to take a decision on any bill in 3 months. Otherwise the bill will be accepted as approved. However, there is no provision in the constitution in which the governors and the President are tied to the time limit to approve the bill. The President has sought opinion on the decision of the Supreme Court bench. The governors and the President say how the Supreme Court can interfere in their work. At the same time, the governments of Kerala and Tamil Nadu have opposed the President’s opinion by applying in the Supreme Court. The two states have said in the application that it is not capable of hearing to seek opinion from the President.
On the application filed by the governments of Kerala and Tamil Nadu, the Supreme Court’s Constitution Bench asked what is wrong and are you saying your point seriously? The Constitution Bench told the lawyers of Kerala and Tamil Nadu governments that we are in a position to give advice or opinion here. The judges said that we are not sitting as Appellate Authority against any decision of the Supreme Court itself. No decision can be reversed, but if the court has given any opinion, we can correct it. At the same time, the Solicitor General said on the matter of the Constitution Bench that the decision in which the mistake is made, the court can overturn. On this, Chief Justice BR Gavai said that we can turn the opinion, not the decision.
