New Delhi. The heartbeat of hundreds of people present outside the court had increased when the Varanasi court was about to pronounce the verdict on the Gyanvapi Masjid. In this case, a petition was filed from Hindu to Muslim side. Everyone had their own reasoning. But, in the midst of these arguments, the question was, what is the decision of the court. Let us tell you that earlier on August 22, the court had reserved the decision while hearing it. But, today i.e. on Monday (September 12), the court was about to pronounce the verdict in the Gyanvapi case whether the petition is maintainable or not? In fact, in this case, the Muslim side had to say from the very beginning that this petition was not maintainable. Therefore, there was a demand from the Muslim side that it should be rejected, because allegedly some people are also taking political advantage from it. So in such a situation, before the court hearing the matter duly, the challenge was to decide whether the petition is maintainable or not?
So what did the court decide?
In fact, the Varanasi Court, while giving its decision on the basis of 7 rule number 11, has considered the petition to be maintainable. Along with this, the petition of the Muslim side has been dismissed, in which it was demanded that the petition of the Hindu side be dismissed. In this way, while the court ruled in favor of the Hindu side, the petition of the Muslim side was dismissed. On the other hand, the Hindu side welcomed the said decision of the court with the echo of Har Har Mahadev. As soon as the said decision of the court came, there was a wave of happiness in the Hindu side. Apart from this, the Muslim side has criticized the decision given by the court in favor of the Hindu side.
#WATCH , Varanasi, UP: “Bharat is happy today, my Hindu brothers & sisters should light diyas to celebrate,” says petitioner from Hindu side Manju Vyas as she dances & celebrates the Gyanvapi Shringar Gauri verdict pic.twitter.com/hO7frpErNF
— ANI UP/Uttarakhand (@ANINewsUP) September 12, 2022
The Muslim side has spoken of going to the higher court against the decision. On this, the Hindu side said that if the Muslim side moves the Supreme Court against the decision, then the Hindu side will also approach the higher court. At the same time, the court has declared the Place of Worship App ineffective in the above case. Let us inform that even before the hearing of the Gyanvapi case, the Muslim side has been referring to the Place Act. On which today the court while making important remarks said that the Place of Worship Act cannot be considered relevant in the above case. Keep in mind that on May 26, the decision on the said matter was reserved. At the same time, now the next hearing of this case will be on September 22.
Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh | It’s a win for the Hindu community. The next hearing is on Sep 22. It’s a foundation stone for the Gyanvapi temple. Appeal to people to maintain peace: Sohan Lal Arya, petitioner in the #GyanvapiMosque case pic.twitter.com/ZfldKGamv0
— ANI UP/Uttarakhand (@ANINewsUP) September 12, 2022
On the other hand, in the context of the above decision of the court, legal experts have said that the Hindu side should not see it as a complete victory. Now he has to fight a long legal battle in the said case. Now in such a situation, what is the decision taken during the hearing of the above case. All eyes will be on this. But, know one thing here that after the said decision of the court, the security forces have been instructed to be ready. Section 144 has also been imposed in many sensitive areas. All activities are being closely monitored. However, now in the midst of all these circumstances, what will the whole matter take in the coming days. All eyes will be on this. Till then, keep reading to be aware of all the big news of the country and the world. anytv.com