New Delhi. The Supreme Court has upheld the clean chit of PM Narendra Modi on behalf of the SIT in the 2002 Gujarat riots case. The court says that due to the negligence of some state officials, the entire administration cannot be called guilty. Apart from this, the court has also praised the work of the SIT. The court has clearly said on the matter that false testimony was given to implicate Narendra Modi and others. No evidence has been found to show that the Godhra incident and the subsequent violence were well-planned or part of a planned conspiracy. The court has said a lot on the matter, so let us tell you in detail what the court has said while maintaining the clean chit of Narendra Modi.
It is wrong to blame the whole government because of some disgruntled officials.
A bench of SC Justices Dinesh Maheshwari, CT Ravikumar and AM Khanwilkar said a lot in the 452-page judgment. The Supreme Court has upheld the clean chit while dismissing the plea of former Congress MP Zakia Jafri. Let us inform that Zakia Jafri had challenged the clean chit given by the court to 64 people including Narendra Modi. Which has now been rejected outright by the court. The court, while dismissing the petition, said that the Godhra incident and the violence that followed was a well-planned or part of a planned conspiracy. So it is not right to blame the administration. The court said that some disgruntled officials and others wanted to create sensation on the pretext of Gujarat riots but all the information it had was factless and false.
An attempt was made to make the case Hindu vs Muslim.
The court in its remarks also reprimanded those who wasted and misused the time of the court. The court said in a stern tone that the trial of the case is going on since 2006 and at times questions have been raised on the integrity of the officer involved. At the same time, to give a new color to the case, IPS officers – RB Sreekumar and Sanjeev Bhatt gave false testimony. Action should be taken against such people. He said that an attempt was also made to make the case Hindu versus Muslim but there was no evidence to prove that Muslims were deliberately targeted.