New Delhi. While Muslim organizations are opposing the decision of Varanasi District Judge Dr. AK Vishvesh in the Gyanvapi Masjid case, the radical organization Popular Front of India PFI has issued a provocative statement on the pretext of this decision and linked it to the fear of bloodshed. In a statement issued by PFI Chairman OMA Salam, it has been said that the court did not take a forward-looking decision. It said that while allowing the application (of the Hindu side), the court ignored the incidents of polarization in Indian society and the killing of innocent people in the country on the pretext of Babri Masjid case. In the statement, the PFI chairman also said that the time has come to end the practice of people of other religions claiming their places of worship and property from the country. The name of PFI has also figured in many violent cases like the Delhi riots. In Bihar, such documents were recovered in the police raid, in which the conspiracy to make India an Islamic country by 2047 was revealed by quoting PFI. However, the organization has shied away from all these allegations.
Gyanvapi Masjid judgement will embolden fascist agenda to target minority places of worship#GyanvapiCase #Islamophobia #GyanvapiMasjid #GyanvapiVerdict #Varanasi #PopularFrontofIndia pic.twitter.com/AyUEwxglxP
— Popular Front of India (@PFIOofficial) September 12, 2022
Let us inform that earlier, the All India Muslim Personal Law Board, an organization of Muslims, had issued a statement on the decision of the Gyanvapi Masjid case. Even the word ‘Hindu extremist’ has been used in that statement of the board. Expressing grief over the decision, the board has said that the court’s decision has come on the application of Hindu extremists. Whereas, Merajuddin Siddiqui, the lawyer of the Masajid Arrangement Committee, which looks after the management of the Gyanvapi Masjid, has even attacked the court saying ‘all sold out’. Siddiqui had given this statement in front of the media yesterday after the decision of the district judge came.
Let us tell you that 5 Hindu women had sought permission from the court to worship Shringar Gauri, Hanumanji, Ganeshji and other deities located in the Gyanvapi mosque complex. On this, earlier the Civil Judge Senior Division had sent a commissioner to the mosque and got the survey done. Against this, the Masajid Committee went to the Supreme Court. On this, the Supreme Court had directed the District Judge of Varanasi to see whether there was maintainability in the application of the Hindu side. That is, whether it is worth hearing or not. On this, the District Judge, while pronouncing the verdict on Monday, said that the application of Hindus is worth hearing.