Stone pelting on the army is an old thing… How did Kashmir change after the end of Article 370?

New Delhi. The year was 2019, the date was 5 August when the central government abolished Article 370 from Jammu and Kashmir. After the abolition of Article 370, it is now necessary to discuss whether Kashmir needed 370? Supporters of Article 370 say that it protected the autonomy of Kashmir and helped in maintaining the special status of the state. The removal of Article 370 has increased the interference of the central government. They say that Article 370 gave the people of Kashmir the freedom to take their own decisions. Kashmir leaders say that the removal of Article 370 has ended the autonomy of the state.

On the other hand, the government says that Article 370 was becoming an obstacle in the way of development and security in Kashmir. It was necessary to take this decision for the development and security of Kashmir. According to the government, due to Article 370, terrorism and separatism were increasing in Kashmir and there were difficulties in connecting the people of the state with the mainstream of the country.

Let us tell you that the effect of 370 was that unlike other states, the Parliament had the right to make laws for Jammu and Kashmir on the subjects of defence, foreign affairs and communication, but to implement laws related to any other subject, the Centre needed the approval of the state government. On the other hand, Article 356 of the Constitution does not apply here. Due to this, the President had no authority over this state. Article 360 ​​of the Constitution, which provides for imposing financial emergency in the country, was also not applicable to Jammu and Kashmir.

After the abolition of Article 370, it is now being claimed that Kashmir has changed a lot. There is peace in Kashmir now, the incident of stone pelting on the army has been buried in the pages of history. After the abolition of Article 370, it has become easier for outsiders to buy land in Jammu and Kashmir. Before 5 August 2019, people from other states could not buy land there. Only the people of the state could buy land and immovable property there. Apart from this, after the abolition of Article 370, tourism and investment have increased in Jammu and Kashmir. If we talk about investment in Jammu and Kashmir, then the investment here has increased tenfold. The infrastructure has also improved.

Let us tell you that Union Home Minister Amit Shah passed the proposal to abolish 370 on 5 August 2019. During this time there was a huge uproar in the Parliament. After the decision to nullify Article 370, Jammu and Kashmir was divided into two union territories – Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh. Various political parties and regional parties gave their reactions to this decision. Some people believed that this decision was necessary for the development and security of Jammu and Kashmir, while others called it a violation of the rights of the Kashmiri people.

Tags: Article 35A, Article 370, jammu kashmir