New Delhi. Temple and mosque politics are not taking the name of ending in the country. At present, the issue of Gyanvapi and the issue of Qutub Minar remains the subject of discussion. Both the cases are being heard on a daily basis. The Muslim and Hindu sides are blaming each other. In this episode, there was a debate on the channel till date, in which the views of both the parties were put forward on the basis of the court’s decision to be held on May 26. The debate was hosted by Chitra Tripathi and guest appearances were BJP spokesperson Prem Shukla, AIMIM spokesperson Aseem Waqar, VHP spokesperson Sanjay Shankar Tiwari, lawyer Hindu Paksha Vishnu Jain, SP spokesperson Nahid Lari Khan and historian Dinesh Kapoor. While asking the first question, the anchor asked that the 1991 Place of Worship Act, on which the issue of Gyanvapi is being taken forward, does not apply to it.
AIMIM spokesperson Aseem Waqar claims – fountain is not Shivling
Responding to this question, AIMIM spokesperson Aseem Waqar says that these people themselves are creating controversy in Hinduism. We don’t know why they are doing this. What Hinduism is calling Shivling, there is a very long hole inside it. To measure its depth, stitches were used. Which went way too low. This is not a Shivling but a fountain. Hinduism itself is conflicting in its own religion. Some saints have claimed that it is not a Shivling but a fountain. Giving a befitting reply to this, the lawyer for the Hindu side Vishnu Jain said that if it is a fountain, then show it by running it. Because the removal of the wall of the Vazukhana is not being allowed. We also want to see if this is really a fountain, so how does it work? He said that one has broken our Shivling. Drilled a hole in it. Now they are being declared as fountains.
If there is a fountain then show it – Hindu side
Vishnu Jain challenged AIMIM spokesperson Aseem Waqar and said that if it is indeed a fountain, then the wall of the Vazukhana should be removed and allowed to investigate. Are you people telling lies or we..it will come to the fore. At the same time, AIMIM spokesperson Aseem Waqar said that the inquiry committee which is sitting is not conducting the investigation in a fair manner. If it is a fountain then it will work too…but bring fair people to investigate it.
#GyanvapiCase: AIMIM Spokesperson @syedasimwaqar Said, “The dispute is arising in the Hindu religion itself.”
Hindu side lawyer @Vishnu_Jain1 replied to the allegation. #Varanasi #UttarPradesh #Dangal , @chitraaum pic.twitter.com/rSWW9uPB13— AajTak (@aajtak) May 24, 2022