Uttar Pradesh News Desk!!! The Hindu side has suffered a major setback in the Gyanvapi case. Varanasi court has rejected the petition of the Hindu side. The Hindu side had approached the court demanding an ASI survey of Gyanvapi. Rejecting the petition, the court has said that there will be no ASI survey of the remaining parts of Gyanvapi. On the decision of the court, the Hindu side says that they will challenge this decision in the High Court. This decision has come after 33 years in the main case of Gyanvapi case. The FTC Court of Varanasi has rejected the demand for additional survey of Gyanvapi complex. Since the cases related to this matter were in the High Court and the Supreme Court, Jugal Shambhu’s court rejected the petition of the Hindu side.
The court did not listen to our arguments
In the 1991 case of Mulvad Lord Visheshwar vs. Anjuman Intejamia Masjid Committee, the court, in its 18-page judgment, rejected the demand of the Hindu side and said that the related cases were already pending in the High Court and the Supreme Court. Hindu party Vijay Shankar Rastogi said that the court did not listen to any of our arguments. Even the decision of 18 April 2021 was ignored. We will go to the High Court against this decision.
We were saying this earlier also
At the same time, the Muslim side has welcomed the court’s decision. Muslim side’s lawyer Akhlaq Ahmed said that the court accepted our argument and gave the verdict in our favor. We were already saying that the cases related to this are already going on in the higher court. Therefore this petition should be rejected by this court. We are happy that the court listened to us.
These were the main issues on which hearing took place in the court for more than five months. The Hindu side demanded that to know the truth about the Gyanvapi complex, there should be an ASI survey of the sealed basements as well as the rest of the complex. Permission to dig a 4×4 trench to find out the truth about the Shivalingam figure. What is the connection between Plot No. 1930, which has been surveyed by the ASI from 1931 to 1932?
Both sides debate in FTC court
Lord Vishveshwar’s 1991 original hearing heard an application for additional survey. The court had reserved the files for giving its verdict on October 25. Most of the debate took place on this issue. An argument was given on behalf of the defendant Anjuman Intezamia Masjid Committee against the application related to the survey of the entire complex. It was told that the survey has been conducted by ASI. Now no need for additional survey. The Supreme Court has said in an earlier order that now if any work is done in Gyanvapi, permission will have to be taken for it. Therefore this application deserves to be rejected. In this case, Vijay Shankar Rastogi had said that the Supreme Court has directed to preserve the Vajukhana and the survey of the Vajukhana and the rest of the premises can be conducted in a safe environment. Hindu party will suffer loss due to incomplete survey report. Below the main dome is a hundred feet Jyotirlinga of Adivisheshwar. To know its truth, permission was given to dig a 4×4 trench. Rastogi argued that there is a hundred feet Adivisheshwar under the main dome. These can be detected by GPR survey by digging a trench of 4×4 feet to reach them. Even in ASI’s survey through GPR, no signal was found below 5.8 meters and there was evidence of some bridging by heavy stones. The Muslim side termed Rastogi’s demand from Judge Jugal Shambhu as impractical. Muslim side’s lawyers Mumtaz Ahmed and Akhlaq Ahmed said that firstly, it is impractical to dig a 4×4 trench up to a hundred feet and then go down to that level for GPR survey and secondly, there is a court ban on it. On any type of excavation. During the hearing, the Muslim side claimed that in the Permanent Settlement of 1883-84, Ahle Islam is written before plot number 9130. This was the strongest claim of the Muslim side that they had ownership rights on Gyanvapi. On this basis, the Muslim side won in the case of Deen Mohammad. On behalf of the Hindu side, Rastogi said that the Central Sunni Waqf Board has included Ahle Islam in place of Lord Visheshwar by faking the ranks. In the Doshipura case, 245 Waqfs of Banaras have been proved fake in the Supreme Court. Muslim party should show the documents related to Waqf of plot 9130 on which Ahle Islam claims to write.