After US President Donald Trump offered arbitration on the Kashmir issue between India and Pakistan, the entire opposition, including the Congress, has expressed displeasure. The opposition says that India does not need the intervention of America or any other country to find a solution to the Kashmir issue. Together, Trump was also advised to understand the issue seriously.
Shiv Sena MP Priyanka Chaturvedi said in a post on X on Sunday that India would have to face this challenge without the intervention of any country. The Shiv Sena (UBT) leader said, “We do not need the intervention of America or any other country to find a solution to the Kashmir issue. Destiny has given us this responsibility and India should be ready for this challenge.”
Congress leader Supriya Srinet said, “Pakistan is a wicked country and cannot be trusted. He is always involved in anti -India activities and supports terrorists. This is the same Pakistan, where America entered and killed Osama bin Laden … Congress party demands that the Parliament be called and tell the whole incident to the Prime Minister and Parliament how the US President should tell how the US President should declare the whole incident and the US President should tell the whole incident. Talking parallel, the US Foreign Minister says that it will be canceled at the neutral place.
Rajya Sabha MP Kapil Sibal said, “Many questions will arise on this tweet too … So what happened (about the Indo-Pakistan agreement), how and why, we have not been given any information about it … So we will not criticize today. We will not want to have a special session of Parliament and an all-party meeting is called. I do not want to appeal to all political parties until the government will be able to meet in the meeting until the Prime Minister will be involved in the meeting until the meeting is present. May I be confident that if Dr. Manmohan Singh had been the Prime Minister today, he would have been present in the all -party meeting and special session would have been called. “
RJD MP Manoj Jha said, “We were suffering, and we made an accurate target that no citizens were casualties, and we attacked 9 terrorist sites. But we lost our people, officers. Tried to deny and said that there was no such intervention. But, this attempt by the so -called ‘sarpanch’ of the whole world is not good for a democratic country like us. “
BJD vice -president Prasanna Acharya said, “How can Trump declare a unilateral ceasefire? Is he Prime Minister or President of India? Or he represents Pakistan? He is a third side. He is not his job to declare a war. We should not be influenced or directed by a third country.
In a post on X, Tiwari said, “In the US, someone in America needs to educate his President Donald Trump seriously that there is no 1000 -year -old struggle described in the Kashmir Bible. It started on October 22, 1947 – 78 years ago when Pakistan invaded the independent state of Jammu and Kashmir, which was later handed over to India by Maharaja Hari Singh on 26 October 1947, which was later captured by Maharaja Hari Singh, in which it was handed over by Maharaja Hari Singh on 26 October, 1947. Gone areas include how difficult it is to understand this simple fact? “
The Congress has demanded an all-party meeting under the chairmanship of the Prime Minister to discuss in detail the firing between India and Pakistan and the consent made to stop military action. It also said that a special session of Parliament should be called on this.
Congress General Secretary Jairam Ramesh asked the government whether New Delhi had opened doors for third -party intervention between India and Pakistan, and whether diplomatic channels have been opened with Pakistan. It is worth noting that he has raised these questions after an agreement to stop land, air and sea firing and military operations on the ground, air and sea with immediate effect after drone and missile attacks from across the border for four days on Saturday.
In a post on X, Jairam Ramesh said, “The Indian National Congress chaired by the Prime Minister, with an all -party meeting and Pahalgam, Operation Sindoor and first from Washington DC and then later reiterating their demand for a special session of Parliament to discuss the declarations of the ceasefire by the governments of India and Pakistan.”
Ramesh said that the Congress believes that the “neutral site” mentioned by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio for talks between India and Pakistan raises many questions.
He asked, “Have we abandoned the Shimla Agreement? Have we opened doors for third party mediation? The Indian National Congress would like to ask if diplomatic channels are being reopening between India and Pakistan? What commitments did we ask and what did we get?”
Significantly, this was said by President Trump on Sunday after welcoming the end of enmity between India and Pakistan. He said that if peace was not established, millions of people could have been killed. The US President was referring to a possible nuclear attack between the two countries.
In a post on Truth Social, the US President said, “I am very proud of the strong and strong powerful leadership of India and Pakistan, because they have the power, intelligence and patience to know and understand that the time has come to stop the current attack, which could have killed many people. Millions of good and innocent people could be killed! Your legacy has increased a lot.”
Trump persists on the claim that the US has helped establish peace and offered arbitration to resolve the Kashmir issue.
He wrote, “I am proud that America was able to help you reach this historical and heroic decision. While it has not been discussed, I am going to increase the trade with these two great nations to a great extent. In addition, I will work together to see if you can find a solution in relation to Kashmir after” thousand years “.
India has repeatedly rejected the intervention of any third party on the Jammu and Kashmir issue and clearly stated that the region is an integral part of India. On Saturday, India also underestimated the role of America in the agreement to end enmity, saying that the DGMOs of the two countries have agreed.
