New Delhi/Varanasi. After the verdict of Varanasi District Judge Dr. Ajay Krishna Vishwesh in the Gyanvapi Masjid case, the Muslim side flared up. The lawyer of the Masajid Prajataniya Committee, the management of the Gyanvapi Masjid, told everyone that it was sold out. At the same time, the All India Muslim Personal Law Board expressed its displeasure over the decision, using the word ‘Hindu fundamentalist’. First, let us tell you what the lawyer of the Masajid Committee, Merajuddin Siddiqui, said. Merajuddin said after the verdict that it was told from our side that this case should not be heard here. Our petition was rejected. We will go to the High Court and appeal.
After this he said that if the decision of the Parliament is not accepted, then you can understand that the judiciary is yours. After that the order will not be accepted. Then they will say that sell our hands. Sold. Such is their decision order. His order does not seem to be justified. Whatever order has been placed on that application, it is not just and fair. This statement of Merajuddin Siddiqui was very much discussed. At the same time, the Personal Law Board has taken another step in this matter. The board spoke of Hindu extremism. In a statement issued by the board’s general secretary Khalid Saifullah Rahmani, the court’s decision was described as disappointing and sad. It also said that the court initially accepted the Hindu extremist claim.
Varanasi District Court Judge’s decision in Gyanvapi Masjid case is disappointing and sad: General Secretary Board#GyanvapiMasjid #GyanvapiVerdict pic.twitter.com/5B8NHFGXsz
— All India Muslim Personal Law Board (@AIMPLB_Official) September 12, 2022
Let us inform that the District Judge of Varanasi has accepted the maintainability of the application of the Hindu side to offer prayers at the Gyanvapi Masjid. The district judge, in his order on Monday, had said that the Muslim side opposed the application of the Hindu side under the Kashi Vishwanath Temple Act, the Waqf Act and the Places of Worship Act 1991, but all these three laws were not applicable in this case. In this case, the district judge has fixed September 22 as the next date of hearing, but if the Muslim side goes to the High Court and gets a stay from there, then the hearing will not be held on that day. Overall, the matter seems to be dragging on for a long time.