Nupur Sharma is facing all-round criticism after she made objectionable remarks about Prophet Mohammad during a TV debate. All political parties and Muslim religious leaders have demanded action against Nupur Sharma, while Bhim Army’s Satpal Tanwar has made derogatory remarks about Nupur Sharma and said that the person who cut off Nupur Sharma’s tongue will be given a reward of 1 crore. . On the other hand, senior advocate Rizwan Ahmed, referring to the same TV debate, raised the question whether immoral language was used for Shivling or not and if it did, why is there silence against the person speaking such language? Why all the anger against Nupur Sharma only?
During a debate on Times Now Navbharat, Rizwan Ahmed took a dig at Muslim religious leaders and all those who are demanding action against Nupur Sharma. Questioning his intention, the senior lawyer said, “If immoral language was used for Shivling in that debate, then why not issue a fatwa by naming that person? Why don’t you exclude that person from your caste? Why don’t you say that you will cut off your tongue?
Rizwan Ahmed was furious. He said, “You don’t say this because you guys are liars, you guys are hoaxes.” In ‘Face to Face’, Rizwan Ahmed objected to Nupur Sharma being targeted and said, “Public the entire debate and let the public decide who did the wrong first and then both should be punished accordingly.” Don’t target only one woman Nupur Sharma.”
Who provoked Nupur Sharma? – Rizwan Ahmed
He said, “If you want to speak, speak Rahmani-Nupur, don’t speak Nupur Sharma alone. Then you will be a believer and you will be true.” Rizwan Ahmed says, “Muslims got furious over wrong slogans on Ram Navami, Nupur Sharma used wrong language and stone pelters got furious in Kanpur, but no one dares to ask who provoked Nupur Sharma? When I am asking this, everyone says that the police will do their job.”