Publish Date: | Sat, 26 Feb 2022 11:37 AM (IST)
The Supreme Court refused to hear a woman’s plea on Friday. He had sought cancellation of bail of the accused for raping her. The court said that it appears to be a case of mutually consensual relationship. In which she went to the hotels with the accused. She spent the money sent by her husband posted on the border of the Central Security Force.
did not interfere with the order of the high court
A bench of Justice DY Chandrachud and Justice Surya Kant refused to interfere with the decisions of the Rajasthan High Court granting bail to the accused. Peetha said the woman left her children alone at home and went to hotels with the accused. The woman also rented a separate room nearby to live with him. In this way you were spending employee husband’s money in ITBP. Posted on the border, he did not even know what his wife was doing at home.
a matter of consensual relationship
Justice DY Chandrachud said, “It appears that it was a case of consensual relationship. In such a situation, we will not interfere in the order of the High Court. Advocate Aditya Jain, appearing for the woman, argued that the accused harassed the woman. He raped the victim several times. Along with this, the accused also blackmailed the woman for money. He also cited bank transactions to prove it. Said that the High Court did not consider the arguments. The accused was granted bail only saying that a charge sheet had been filed in the case. According to the petition by the woman seeking cancellation of bail, the accused was booked under section 376 of the IPC and the provisions of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Act 1989.
Posted By: Sandeep Chourey