New Delhi. The case was held in the Supreme Court today in the case related to the time limit for the President and the governors to pass the bill. Chief Justice Justice BR Gavai referred to the current situation of neighboring countries like Nepal and Bangladesh and said that we are proud of the constitution of our country. You see what kind of situations remain in neighboring countries. Justice Vikramnath, who was involved in a five -judge bench on this matter of CJI, also agreed. Explain that the bench of five judges of the Supreme Court has been hearing on the reference of the President for the last several days.
Earlier yesterday, lawyers from Punjab, Karnataka, Kerala and Telangana argued that the President and the governor would also have to approve the unconstitutional bill, as the constitution has not said anything about stopping such bills. In fact, a bench of Supreme Court Justice JB Pardiwala ruled on 8 April on the Tamil Nadu government’s plea that the President and the Governor would have to take a decision on the bills in 3 months. The case caught up a big political. Former Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar had questioned this decision of the Supreme Court several times from the public platform.
After this, a reference was sent by the President to the Supreme Court in which the President needs to consult the Supreme Court through reference under Article 143 of the Constitution and to protect the Bill for the President’s consent or otherwise on behalf of the Supreme Court through reference under Article 143 of the Constitution under Article 143 of the Constitution? A total of 14 similar questions have been made in reference by the President. Now hearing is going on in the Supreme Court in this case.
