Tuesday, 31 January, 2023
  • OMICRON
  • COVID-19
  • Omicron Variant India
  • India Omicron Cases
  • UP Assembly election 2022
  • Narendra Modi
AnyTV News
No Result
View All Result
  • Latest News
    • India
    • Regional
    • World
  • Top News
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Technology
    • Mobile
    • Gadgets
    • Internet
  • More
    • Lifestyle
    • Health
    • Automobiles
    • Education
    • Viral News
    • Web Stories
Hindi
  • Latest News
    • India
    • Regional
    • World
  • Top News
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Technology
    • Mobile
    • Gadgets
    • Internet
  • More
    • Lifestyle
    • Health
    • Automobiles
    • Education
    • Viral News
    • Web Stories
Hindi
No Result
View All Result
AnyTV News
  • Latest News
  • Top News
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Technology
  • Lifestyle
  • Health
  • Automobiles
  • Education
  • Viral News
  • Web Stories
Home Top News

Wife making ‘300 obscene Tiktok videos’ does not give husband the right to be cruel to her!, know why the Supreme Court made this remark

by AnyTV
05/03/2021
in Top News, Viral News
Reading Time: 2 mins read
0
A A
Wife making '300 obscene Tiktok videos' does not give husband the right to be cruel to her!, know why the Supreme Court made this remark


The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife, which was rejected

New Delhi, March 5 (IANS)| The Supreme Court on Friday refused to grant anticipatory bail to a man who has been accused of cruelty to his wife. The man, in his defense, claimed that his wife had made 300 obscene videos, which was rejected by the top court. Chief Justice SA Bobde and Justice A.S. Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian told the counsel for the petitioner that his client is a cruel person and he should not expect any relief from the court.

The counsel for the petitioner replied that his client was not cruel and had not committed any cruelty. The bench said that his wife has called him cruel in her complaint. The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife.

[(File Photo: IANS)]

Know Supreme Court’s comment

The counsel for the petitioner claimed that the wife has allegedly made ‘300 TikTok videos’ which are obscene. To this the bench said, “It does not mean that a man should inflict any kind of cruelty on his wife. Even if he has done so, you will not misbehave with her.”

Said – If I did not want to live together, I would have got divorced

The counsel for the petitioner insisted for relief in the matter. The Chief Justice replied, “You would have divorced him, if you cannot live together, there is no need for cruelty.” The counsel for the petitioner submitted that there was no need for custodial interrogation in the matter. However, the bench replied that it did not agree with the contention of the petitioner, and referred to the FIR lodged by the husband against the wife. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that the FIR registered against his client was one-sided. The Chief Justice replied that FIRs are always one-sided and he has never seen a joint FIR filed by both the parties.

anticipatory bail plea rejected

The counsel for the petitioner urged the court to consider granting anticipatory bail to his client in the matter. Dismissing the matter, the apex court said, “The anticipatory bail plea is dismissed.”


The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife, which was rejected

New Delhi, March 5 (IANS)| The Supreme Court on Friday refused to grant anticipatory bail to a man who has been accused of cruelty to his wife. The man, in his defense, claimed that his wife had made 300 obscene videos, which was rejected by the top court. Chief Justice SA Bobde and Justice A.S. Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian told the counsel for the petitioner that his client is a cruel person and he should not expect any relief from the court.

The counsel for the petitioner replied that his client was not cruel and had not committed any cruelty. The bench said that his wife has called him cruel in her complaint. The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife.

[(File Photo: IANS)]

Know Supreme Court’s comment

The counsel for the petitioner claimed that the wife has allegedly made ‘300 TikTok videos’ which are obscene. To this the bench said, “It does not mean that a man should inflict any kind of cruelty on his wife. Even if he has done so, you will not misbehave with her.”

Said – If I did not want to live together, I would have got divorced

The counsel for the petitioner insisted for relief in the matter. The Chief Justice replied, “You would have divorced him, if you cannot live together, there is no need for cruelty.” The counsel for the petitioner submitted that there was no need for custodial interrogation in the matter. However, the bench replied that it did not agree with the contention of the petitioner, and referred to the FIR lodged by the husband against the wife. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that the FIR registered against his client was one-sided. The Chief Justice replied that FIRs are always one-sided and he has never seen a joint FIR filed by both the parties.

anticipatory bail plea rejected

The counsel for the petitioner urged the court to consider granting anticipatory bail to his client in the matter. Dismissing the matter, the apex court said, “The anticipatory bail plea is dismissed.”


The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife, which was rejected

New Delhi, March 5 (IANS)| The Supreme Court on Friday refused to grant anticipatory bail to a man who has been accused of cruelty to his wife. The man, in his defense, claimed that his wife had made 300 obscene videos, which was rejected by the top court. Chief Justice SA Bobde and Justice A.S. Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian told the counsel for the petitioner that his client is a cruel person and he should not expect any relief from the court.

The counsel for the petitioner replied that his client was not cruel and had not committed any cruelty. The bench said that his wife has called him cruel in her complaint. The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife.

[(File Photo: IANS)]

Know Supreme Court’s comment

The counsel for the petitioner claimed that the wife has allegedly made ‘300 TikTok videos’ which are obscene. To this the bench said, “It does not mean that a man should inflict any kind of cruelty on his wife. Even if he has done so, you will not misbehave with her.”

Said – If I did not want to live together, I would have got divorced

The counsel for the petitioner insisted for relief in the matter. The Chief Justice replied, “You would have divorced him, if you cannot live together, there is no need for cruelty.” The counsel for the petitioner submitted that there was no need for custodial interrogation in the matter. However, the bench replied that it did not agree with the contention of the petitioner, and referred to the FIR lodged by the husband against the wife. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that the FIR registered against his client was one-sided. The Chief Justice replied that FIRs are always one-sided and he has never seen a joint FIR filed by both the parties.

anticipatory bail plea rejected

The counsel for the petitioner urged the court to consider granting anticipatory bail to his client in the matter. Dismissing the matter, the apex court said, “The anticipatory bail plea is dismissed.”


The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife, which was rejected

New Delhi, March 5 (IANS)| The Supreme Court on Friday refused to grant anticipatory bail to a man who has been accused of cruelty to his wife. The man, in his defense, claimed that his wife had made 300 obscene videos, which was rejected by the top court. Chief Justice SA Bobde and Justice A.S. Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian told the counsel for the petitioner that his client is a cruel person and he should not expect any relief from the court.

The counsel for the petitioner replied that his client was not cruel and had not committed any cruelty. The bench said that his wife has called him cruel in her complaint. The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife.

[(File Photo: IANS)]

Know Supreme Court’s comment

The counsel for the petitioner claimed that the wife has allegedly made ‘300 TikTok videos’ which are obscene. To this the bench said, “It does not mean that a man should inflict any kind of cruelty on his wife. Even if he has done so, you will not misbehave with her.”

Said – If I did not want to live together, I would have got divorced

The counsel for the petitioner insisted for relief in the matter. The Chief Justice replied, “You would have divorced him, if you cannot live together, there is no need for cruelty.” The counsel for the petitioner submitted that there was no need for custodial interrogation in the matter. However, the bench replied that it did not agree with the contention of the petitioner, and referred to the FIR lodged by the husband against the wife. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that the FIR registered against his client was one-sided. The Chief Justice replied that FIRs are always one-sided and he has never seen a joint FIR filed by both the parties.

anticipatory bail plea rejected

The counsel for the petitioner urged the court to consider granting anticipatory bail to his client in the matter. Dismissing the matter, the apex court said, “The anticipatory bail plea is dismissed.”

EDITOR'SPICK

King Khan’s first press-conference after the success of the film Pathan, know what he said…

Operation Blue Star: ‘Indira Gandhi allowed Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale to become a demon and then …’, claims the General of Operation Bluestar, watch video

Murali Vijay Retirement: This player said goodbye to cricket between India-New Zealand series


The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife, which was rejected

New Delhi, March 5 (IANS)| The Supreme Court on Friday refused to grant anticipatory bail to a man who has been accused of cruelty to his wife. The man, in his defense, claimed that his wife had made 300 obscene videos, which was rejected by the top court. Chief Justice SA Bobde and Justice A.S. Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian told the counsel for the petitioner that his client is a cruel person and he should not expect any relief from the court.

The counsel for the petitioner replied that his client was not cruel and had not committed any cruelty. The bench said that his wife has called him cruel in her complaint. The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife.

[(File Photo: IANS)]

Know Supreme Court’s comment

The counsel for the petitioner claimed that the wife has allegedly made ‘300 TikTok videos’ which are obscene. To this the bench said, “It does not mean that a man should inflict any kind of cruelty on his wife. Even if he has done so, you will not misbehave with her.”

Said – If I did not want to live together, I would have got divorced

The counsel for the petitioner insisted for relief in the matter. The Chief Justice replied, “You would have divorced him, if you cannot live together, there is no need for cruelty.” The counsel for the petitioner submitted that there was no need for custodial interrogation in the matter. However, the bench replied that it did not agree with the contention of the petitioner, and referred to the FIR lodged by the husband against the wife. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that the FIR registered against his client was one-sided. The Chief Justice replied that FIRs are always one-sided and he has never seen a joint FIR filed by both the parties.

anticipatory bail plea rejected

The counsel for the petitioner urged the court to consider granting anticipatory bail to his client in the matter. Dismissing the matter, the apex court said, “The anticipatory bail plea is dismissed.”


The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife, which was rejected

New Delhi, March 5 (IANS)| The Supreme Court on Friday refused to grant anticipatory bail to a man who has been accused of cruelty to his wife. The man, in his defense, claimed that his wife had made 300 obscene videos, which was rejected by the top court. Chief Justice SA Bobde and Justice A.S. Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian told the counsel for the petitioner that his client is a cruel person and he should not expect any relief from the court.

The counsel for the petitioner replied that his client was not cruel and had not committed any cruelty. The bench said that his wife has called him cruel in her complaint. The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife.

[(File Photo: IANS)]

Know Supreme Court’s comment

The counsel for the petitioner claimed that the wife has allegedly made ‘300 TikTok videos’ which are obscene. To this the bench said, “It does not mean that a man should inflict any kind of cruelty on his wife. Even if he has done so, you will not misbehave with her.”

Said – If I did not want to live together, I would have got divorced

The counsel for the petitioner insisted for relief in the matter. The Chief Justice replied, “You would have divorced him, if you cannot live together, there is no need for cruelty.” The counsel for the petitioner submitted that there was no need for custodial interrogation in the matter. However, the bench replied that it did not agree with the contention of the petitioner, and referred to the FIR lodged by the husband against the wife. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that the FIR registered against his client was one-sided. The Chief Justice replied that FIRs are always one-sided and he has never seen a joint FIR filed by both the parties.

anticipatory bail plea rejected

The counsel for the petitioner urged the court to consider granting anticipatory bail to his client in the matter. Dismissing the matter, the apex court said, “The anticipatory bail plea is dismissed.”


The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife, which was rejected

New Delhi, March 5 (IANS)| The Supreme Court on Friday refused to grant anticipatory bail to a man who has been accused of cruelty to his wife. The man, in his defense, claimed that his wife had made 300 obscene videos, which was rejected by the top court. Chief Justice SA Bobde and Justice A.S. Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian told the counsel for the petitioner that his client is a cruel person and he should not expect any relief from the court.

The counsel for the petitioner replied that his client was not cruel and had not committed any cruelty. The bench said that his wife has called him cruel in her complaint. The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife.

[(File Photo: IANS)]

Know Supreme Court’s comment

The counsel for the petitioner claimed that the wife has allegedly made ‘300 TikTok videos’ which are obscene. To this the bench said, “It does not mean that a man should inflict any kind of cruelty on his wife. Even if he has done so, you will not misbehave with her.”

Said – If I did not want to live together, I would have got divorced

The counsel for the petitioner insisted for relief in the matter. The Chief Justice replied, “You would have divorced him, if you cannot live together, there is no need for cruelty.” The counsel for the petitioner submitted that there was no need for custodial interrogation in the matter. However, the bench replied that it did not agree with the contention of the petitioner, and referred to the FIR lodged by the husband against the wife. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that the FIR registered against his client was one-sided. The Chief Justice replied that FIRs are always one-sided and he has never seen a joint FIR filed by both the parties.

anticipatory bail plea rejected

The counsel for the petitioner urged the court to consider granting anticipatory bail to his client in the matter. Dismissing the matter, the apex court said, “The anticipatory bail plea is dismissed.”


The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife, which was rejected

New Delhi, March 5 (IANS)| The Supreme Court on Friday refused to grant anticipatory bail to a man who has been accused of cruelty to his wife. The man, in his defense, claimed that his wife had made 300 obscene videos, which was rejected by the top court. Chief Justice SA Bobde and Justice A.S. Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian told the counsel for the petitioner that his client is a cruel person and he should not expect any relief from the court.

The counsel for the petitioner replied that his client was not cruel and had not committed any cruelty. The bench said that his wife has called him cruel in her complaint. The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife.

[(File Photo: IANS)]

Know Supreme Court’s comment

The counsel for the petitioner claimed that the wife has allegedly made ‘300 TikTok videos’ which are obscene. To this the bench said, “It does not mean that a man should inflict any kind of cruelty on his wife. Even if he has done so, you will not misbehave with her.”

Said – If I did not want to live together, I would have got divorced

The counsel for the petitioner insisted for relief in the matter. The Chief Justice replied, “You would have divorced him, if you cannot live together, there is no need for cruelty.” The counsel for the petitioner submitted that there was no need for custodial interrogation in the matter. However, the bench replied that it did not agree with the contention of the petitioner, and referred to the FIR lodged by the husband against the wife. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that the FIR registered against his client was one-sided. The Chief Justice replied that FIRs are always one-sided and he has never seen a joint FIR filed by both the parties.

anticipatory bail plea rejected

The counsel for the petitioner urged the court to consider granting anticipatory bail to his client in the matter. Dismissing the matter, the apex court said, “The anticipatory bail plea is dismissed.”

ShareTweetShareSendSend

Related Posts

shahrukh khan

King Khan’s first press-conference after the success of the film Pathan, know what he said…

31/01/2023
7
general kuldeep singh brar

Operation Blue Star: ‘Indira Gandhi allowed Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale to become a demon and then …’, claims the General of Operation Bluestar, watch video

31/01/2023
5

Murali Vijay Retirement: This player said goodbye to cricket between India-New Zealand series

31/01/2023
7

Opportunity to buy LG Refrigerator with huge discount, know list

31/01/2023
6

RecentNews

  • All
  • Latest News
shahrukh khan

King Khan’s first press-conference after the success of the film Pathan, know what he said…

31/01/2023
7
general kuldeep singh brar

Operation Blue Star: ‘Indira Gandhi allowed Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale to become a demon and then …’, claims the General of Operation Bluestar, watch video

31/01/2023
5

Murali Vijay Retirement: This player said goodbye to cricket between India-New Zealand series

31/01/2023
7

Opportunity to buy LG Refrigerator with huge discount, know list

31/01/2023
6

Saudi and GCC will pay in Chinese Yuan. No USD more to be accepted for China Trade

31/01/2023
6

POPULAR STORIES

  • Cricket: Australia ready for tri-series with India-Pakistan, supports Rameez Raja’s proposal

    376 shares
    Share 150 Tweet 94
  • World Archery Para Championships: Para archer Pooja Jaatyan creates history by winning silver medal, the first Indian to do so

    270 shares
    Share 108 Tweet 68
  • Katmoviehd 2022 Katmovie HD Bollywood, Hollywood, Hindi Movies Watch and Download Free

    105 shares
    Share 42 Tweet 26
  • Another video of Anjali Arora is becoming increasingly viral, the senses will be blown away.

    102 shares
    Share 41 Tweet 26
  • Adani Group trashes Hindenburg report

    6 shares
    Share 2 Tweet 2
AnyTV News

AnyTV News is the news magazine, which brings the most reliable, authentic and unbiased news to its dedicated readership.

READ MORE »

Recent Posts

  • King Khan’s first press-conference after the success of the film Pathan, know what he said…
  • Operation Blue Star: ‘Indira Gandhi allowed Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale to become a demon and then …’, claims the General of Operation Bluestar, watch video
  • Murali Vijay Retirement: This player said goodbye to cricket between India-New Zealand series

Categories

  • Automobiles
  • Business
  • DIY
  • Education
  • Entertainment
  • Gadgets
  • Health
  • India
  • Internet
  • Latest News
  • Lifestyle
  • Mobile
  • Opinion
  • Politics
  • Regional
  • Sports
  • Technology
  • Top News
  • Uncategorized
  • Viral News
  • World
  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
  • Contact Us

© 2023 AnyTV News

No Result
View All Result
  • Latest News
    • India
    • Regional
    • World
  • Top News
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Technology
    • Mobile
    • Gadgets
    • Internet
  • Lifestyle
  • Health
  • Automobiles
  • Education
  • Viral News
  • Web Stories

© 2023 AnyTV News

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.
Go to mobile version