Sunday, 1 October, 2023
  • Latest News
    • India
    • Regional
    • World
  • Top News
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Technology
    • Mobile
    • Gadgets
    • Internet
  • More
    • Lifestyle
    • Health
    • Automobiles
    • Education
    • Viral News
    • Web Stories
AnyTV News
No Result
View All Result
  • Latest News
    • India
    • Regional
    • World
  • Top News
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Technology
    • Mobile
    • Gadgets
    • Internet
  • More
    • Lifestyle
    • Health
    • Automobiles
    • Education
    • Viral News
    • Web Stories
Hindi
  • Latest News
    • India
    • Regional
    • World
  • Top News
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Technology
    • Mobile
    • Gadgets
    • Internet
  • More
    • Lifestyle
    • Health
    • Automobiles
    • Education
    • Viral News
    • Web Stories
Hindi
No Result
View All Result
AnyTV News
  • Latest News
  • Top News
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Technology
  • Lifestyle
  • Health
  • Automobiles
  • Education
  • Viral News
  • Web Stories
Home Top News

Wife making ‘300 obscene Tiktok videos’ does not give husband the right to be cruel to her!, know why the Supreme Court made this remark

by AnyTV
05/03/2021
in Top News, Viral News
Reading Time: 2 mins read
0
A A
Wife making '300 obscene Tiktok videos' does not give husband the right to be cruel to her!, know why the Supreme Court made this remark


The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife, which was rejected

New Delhi, March 5 (IANS)| The Supreme Court on Friday refused to grant anticipatory bail to a man who has been accused of cruelty to his wife. The man, in his defense, claimed that his wife had made 300 obscene videos, which was rejected by the top court. Chief Justice SA Bobde and Justice A.S. Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian told the counsel for the petitioner that his client is a cruel person and he should not expect any relief from the court.

The counsel for the petitioner replied that his client was not cruel and had not committed any cruelty. The bench said that his wife has called him cruel in her complaint. The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife.

[(File Photo: IANS)]

Know Supreme Court’s comment

The counsel for the petitioner claimed that the wife has allegedly made ‘300 TikTok videos’ which are obscene. To this the bench said, “It does not mean that a man should inflict any kind of cruelty on his wife. Even if he has done so, you will not misbehave with her.”

Said – If I did not want to live together, I would have got divorced

The counsel for the petitioner insisted for relief in the matter. The Chief Justice replied, “You would have divorced him, if you cannot live together, there is no need for cruelty.” The counsel for the petitioner submitted that there was no need for custodial interrogation in the matter. However, the bench replied that it did not agree with the contention of the petitioner, and referred to the FIR lodged by the husband against the wife. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that the FIR registered against his client was one-sided. The Chief Justice replied that FIRs are always one-sided and he has never seen a joint FIR filed by both the parties.

anticipatory bail plea rejected

The counsel for the petitioner urged the court to consider granting anticipatory bail to his client in the matter. Dismissing the matter, the apex court said, “The anticipatory bail plea is dismissed.”


The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife, which was rejected

New Delhi, March 5 (IANS)| The Supreme Court on Friday refused to grant anticipatory bail to a man who has been accused of cruelty to his wife. The man, in his defense, claimed that his wife had made 300 obscene videos, which was rejected by the top court. Chief Justice SA Bobde and Justice A.S. Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian told the counsel for the petitioner that his client is a cruel person and he should not expect any relief from the court.

The counsel for the petitioner replied that his client was not cruel and had not committed any cruelty. The bench said that his wife has called him cruel in her complaint. The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife.

[(File Photo: IANS)]

Know Supreme Court’s comment

The counsel for the petitioner claimed that the wife has allegedly made ‘300 TikTok videos’ which are obscene. To this the bench said, “It does not mean that a man should inflict any kind of cruelty on his wife. Even if he has done so, you will not misbehave with her.”

Said – If I did not want to live together, I would have got divorced

The counsel for the petitioner insisted for relief in the matter. The Chief Justice replied, “You would have divorced him, if you cannot live together, there is no need for cruelty.” The counsel for the petitioner submitted that there was no need for custodial interrogation in the matter. However, the bench replied that it did not agree with the contention of the petitioner, and referred to the FIR lodged by the husband against the wife. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that the FIR registered against his client was one-sided. The Chief Justice replied that FIRs are always one-sided and he has never seen a joint FIR filed by both the parties.

anticipatory bail plea rejected

The counsel for the petitioner urged the court to consider granting anticipatory bail to his client in the matter. Dismissing the matter, the apex court said, “The anticipatory bail plea is dismissed.”


The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife, which was rejected

New Delhi, March 5 (IANS)| The Supreme Court on Friday refused to grant anticipatory bail to a man who has been accused of cruelty to his wife. The man, in his defense, claimed that his wife had made 300 obscene videos, which was rejected by the top court. Chief Justice SA Bobde and Justice A.S. Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian told the counsel for the petitioner that his client is a cruel person and he should not expect any relief from the court.

The counsel for the petitioner replied that his client was not cruel and had not committed any cruelty. The bench said that his wife has called him cruel in her complaint. The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife.

[(File Photo: IANS)]

Know Supreme Court’s comment

The counsel for the petitioner claimed that the wife has allegedly made ‘300 TikTok videos’ which are obscene. To this the bench said, “It does not mean that a man should inflict any kind of cruelty on his wife. Even if he has done so, you will not misbehave with her.”

Said – If I did not want to live together, I would have got divorced

The counsel for the petitioner insisted for relief in the matter. The Chief Justice replied, “You would have divorced him, if you cannot live together, there is no need for cruelty.” The counsel for the petitioner submitted that there was no need for custodial interrogation in the matter. However, the bench replied that it did not agree with the contention of the petitioner, and referred to the FIR lodged by the husband against the wife. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that the FIR registered against his client was one-sided. The Chief Justice replied that FIRs are always one-sided and he has never seen a joint FIR filed by both the parties.

anticipatory bail plea rejected

The counsel for the petitioner urged the court to consider granting anticipatory bail to his client in the matter. Dismissing the matter, the apex court said, “The anticipatory bail plea is dismissed.”


The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife, which was rejected

New Delhi, March 5 (IANS)| The Supreme Court on Friday refused to grant anticipatory bail to a man who has been accused of cruelty to his wife. The man, in his defense, claimed that his wife had made 300 obscene videos, which was rejected by the top court. Chief Justice SA Bobde and Justice A.S. Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian told the counsel for the petitioner that his client is a cruel person and he should not expect any relief from the court.

The counsel for the petitioner replied that his client was not cruel and had not committed any cruelty. The bench said that his wife has called him cruel in her complaint. The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife.

[(File Photo: IANS)]

Know Supreme Court’s comment

The counsel for the petitioner claimed that the wife has allegedly made ‘300 TikTok videos’ which are obscene. To this the bench said, “It does not mean that a man should inflict any kind of cruelty on his wife. Even if he has done so, you will not misbehave with her.”

Said – If I did not want to live together, I would have got divorced

The counsel for the petitioner insisted for relief in the matter. The Chief Justice replied, “You would have divorced him, if you cannot live together, there is no need for cruelty.” The counsel for the petitioner submitted that there was no need for custodial interrogation in the matter. However, the bench replied that it did not agree with the contention of the petitioner, and referred to the FIR lodged by the husband against the wife. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that the FIR registered against his client was one-sided. The Chief Justice replied that FIRs are always one-sided and he has never seen a joint FIR filed by both the parties.

anticipatory bail plea rejected

The counsel for the petitioner urged the court to consider granting anticipatory bail to his client in the matter. Dismissing the matter, the apex court said, “The anticipatory bail plea is dismissed.”


The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife, which was rejected

New Delhi, March 5 (IANS)| The Supreme Court on Friday refused to grant anticipatory bail to a man who has been accused of cruelty to his wife. The man, in his defense, claimed that his wife had made 300 obscene videos, which was rejected by the top court. Chief Justice SA Bobde and Justice A.S. Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian told the counsel for the petitioner that his client is a cruel person and he should not expect any relief from the court.

The counsel for the petitioner replied that his client was not cruel and had not committed any cruelty. The bench said that his wife has called him cruel in her complaint. The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife.

[(File Photo: IANS)]

Know Supreme Court’s comment

The counsel for the petitioner claimed that the wife has allegedly made ‘300 TikTok videos’ which are obscene. To this the bench said, “It does not mean that a man should inflict any kind of cruelty on his wife. Even if he has done so, you will not misbehave with her.”

Said – If I did not want to live together, I would have got divorced

The counsel for the petitioner insisted for relief in the matter. The Chief Justice replied, “You would have divorced him, if you cannot live together, there is no need for cruelty.” The counsel for the petitioner submitted that there was no need for custodial interrogation in the matter. However, the bench replied that it did not agree with the contention of the petitioner, and referred to the FIR lodged by the husband against the wife. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that the FIR registered against his client was one-sided. The Chief Justice replied that FIRs are always one-sided and he has never seen a joint FIR filed by both the parties.

anticipatory bail plea rejected

The counsel for the petitioner urged the court to consider granting anticipatory bail to his client in the matter. Dismissing the matter, the apex court said, “The anticipatory bail plea is dismissed.”


The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife, which was rejected

New Delhi, March 5 (IANS)| The Supreme Court on Friday refused to grant anticipatory bail to a man who has been accused of cruelty to his wife. The man, in his defense, claimed that his wife had made 300 obscene videos, which was rejected by the top court. Chief Justice SA Bobde and Justice A.S. Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian told the counsel for the petitioner that his client is a cruel person and he should not expect any relief from the court.

The counsel for the petitioner replied that his client was not cruel and had not committed any cruelty. The bench said that his wife has called him cruel in her complaint. The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife.

[(File Photo: IANS)]

Know Supreme Court’s comment

The counsel for the petitioner claimed that the wife has allegedly made ‘300 TikTok videos’ which are obscene. To this the bench said, “It does not mean that a man should inflict any kind of cruelty on his wife. Even if he has done so, you will not misbehave with her.”

Said – If I did not want to live together, I would have got divorced

The counsel for the petitioner insisted for relief in the matter. The Chief Justice replied, “You would have divorced him, if you cannot live together, there is no need for cruelty.” The counsel for the petitioner submitted that there was no need for custodial interrogation in the matter. However, the bench replied that it did not agree with the contention of the petitioner, and referred to the FIR lodged by the husband against the wife. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that the FIR registered against his client was one-sided. The Chief Justice replied that FIRs are always one-sided and he has never seen a joint FIR filed by both the parties.

anticipatory bail plea rejected

The counsel for the petitioner urged the court to consider granting anticipatory bail to his client in the matter. Dismissing the matter, the apex court said, “The anticipatory bail plea is dismissed.”


The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife, which was rejected

New Delhi, March 5 (IANS)| The Supreme Court on Friday refused to grant anticipatory bail to a man who has been accused of cruelty to his wife. The man, in his defense, claimed that his wife had made 300 obscene videos, which was rejected by the top court. Chief Justice SA Bobde and Justice A.S. Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian told the counsel for the petitioner that his client is a cruel person and he should not expect any relief from the court.

The counsel for the petitioner replied that his client was not cruel and had not committed any cruelty. The bench said that his wife has called him cruel in her complaint. The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife.

[(File Photo: IANS)]

Know Supreme Court’s comment

The counsel for the petitioner claimed that the wife has allegedly made ‘300 TikTok videos’ which are obscene. To this the bench said, “It does not mean that a man should inflict any kind of cruelty on his wife. Even if he has done so, you will not misbehave with her.”

Said – If I did not want to live together, I would have got divorced

The counsel for the petitioner insisted for relief in the matter. The Chief Justice replied, “You would have divorced him, if you cannot live together, there is no need for cruelty.” The counsel for the petitioner submitted that there was no need for custodial interrogation in the matter. However, the bench replied that it did not agree with the contention of the petitioner, and referred to the FIR lodged by the husband against the wife. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that the FIR registered against his client was one-sided. The Chief Justice replied that FIRs are always one-sided and he has never seen a joint FIR filed by both the parties.

anticipatory bail plea rejected

The counsel for the petitioner urged the court to consider granting anticipatory bail to his client in the matter. Dismissing the matter, the apex court said, “The anticipatory bail plea is dismissed.”


The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife, which was rejected

New Delhi, March 5 (IANS)| The Supreme Court on Friday refused to grant anticipatory bail to a man who has been accused of cruelty to his wife. The man, in his defense, claimed that his wife had made 300 obscene videos, which was rejected by the top court. Chief Justice SA Bobde and Justice A.S. Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian told the counsel for the petitioner that his client is a cruel person and he should not expect any relief from the court.

The counsel for the petitioner replied that his client was not cruel and had not committed any cruelty. The bench said that his wife has called him cruel in her complaint. The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife.

[(File Photo: IANS)]

Know Supreme Court’s comment

The counsel for the petitioner claimed that the wife has allegedly made ‘300 TikTok videos’ which are obscene. To this the bench said, “It does not mean that a man should inflict any kind of cruelty on his wife. Even if he has done so, you will not misbehave with her.”

Said – If I did not want to live together, I would have got divorced

The counsel for the petitioner insisted for relief in the matter. The Chief Justice replied, “You would have divorced him, if you cannot live together, there is no need for cruelty.” The counsel for the petitioner submitted that there was no need for custodial interrogation in the matter. However, the bench replied that it did not agree with the contention of the petitioner, and referred to the FIR lodged by the husband against the wife. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that the FIR registered against his client was one-sided. The Chief Justice replied that FIRs are always one-sided and he has never seen a joint FIR filed by both the parties.

anticipatory bail plea rejected

The counsel for the petitioner urged the court to consider granting anticipatory bail to his client in the matter. Dismissing the matter, the apex court said, “The anticipatory bail plea is dismissed.”

EDITOR'SPICK

If you still have Rs 2000 notes left after today, then know what to do with them.

India’s Aditi Ashok created history by winning silver medal in the golf competition of Asian Games, for the first time the country got a medal in this event.

Virat Kohli is going to become a father again?, Anushka Sharma is also excited about the little guest!


The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife, which was rejected

New Delhi, March 5 (IANS)| The Supreme Court on Friday refused to grant anticipatory bail to a man who has been accused of cruelty to his wife. The man, in his defense, claimed that his wife had made 300 obscene videos, which was rejected by the top court. Chief Justice SA Bobde and Justice A.S. Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian told the counsel for the petitioner that his client is a cruel person and he should not expect any relief from the court.

The counsel for the petitioner replied that his client was not cruel and had not committed any cruelty. The bench said that his wife has called him cruel in her complaint. The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife.

[(File Photo: IANS)]

Know Supreme Court’s comment

The counsel for the petitioner claimed that the wife has allegedly made ‘300 TikTok videos’ which are obscene. To this the bench said, “It does not mean that a man should inflict any kind of cruelty on his wife. Even if he has done so, you will not misbehave with her.”

Said – If I did not want to live together, I would have got divorced

The counsel for the petitioner insisted for relief in the matter. The Chief Justice replied, “You would have divorced him, if you cannot live together, there is no need for cruelty.” The counsel for the petitioner submitted that there was no need for custodial interrogation in the matter. However, the bench replied that it did not agree with the contention of the petitioner, and referred to the FIR lodged by the husband against the wife. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that the FIR registered against his client was one-sided. The Chief Justice replied that FIRs are always one-sided and he has never seen a joint FIR filed by both the parties.

anticipatory bail plea rejected

The counsel for the petitioner urged the court to consider granting anticipatory bail to his client in the matter. Dismissing the matter, the apex court said, “The anticipatory bail plea is dismissed.”


The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife, which was rejected

New Delhi, March 5 (IANS)| The Supreme Court on Friday refused to grant anticipatory bail to a man who has been accused of cruelty to his wife. The man, in his defense, claimed that his wife had made 300 obscene videos, which was rejected by the top court. Chief Justice SA Bobde and Justice A.S. Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian told the counsel for the petitioner that his client is a cruel person and he should not expect any relief from the court.

The counsel for the petitioner replied that his client was not cruel and had not committed any cruelty. The bench said that his wife has called him cruel in her complaint. The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife.

[(File Photo: IANS)]

Know Supreme Court’s comment

The counsel for the petitioner claimed that the wife has allegedly made ‘300 TikTok videos’ which are obscene. To this the bench said, “It does not mean that a man should inflict any kind of cruelty on his wife. Even if he has done so, you will not misbehave with her.”

Said – If I did not want to live together, I would have got divorced

The counsel for the petitioner insisted for relief in the matter. The Chief Justice replied, “You would have divorced him, if you cannot live together, there is no need for cruelty.” The counsel for the petitioner submitted that there was no need for custodial interrogation in the matter. However, the bench replied that it did not agree with the contention of the petitioner, and referred to the FIR lodged by the husband against the wife. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that the FIR registered against his client was one-sided. The Chief Justice replied that FIRs are always one-sided and he has never seen a joint FIR filed by both the parties.

anticipatory bail plea rejected

The counsel for the petitioner urged the court to consider granting anticipatory bail to his client in the matter. Dismissing the matter, the apex court said, “The anticipatory bail plea is dismissed.”


The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife, which was rejected

New Delhi, March 5 (IANS)| The Supreme Court on Friday refused to grant anticipatory bail to a man who has been accused of cruelty to his wife. The man, in his defense, claimed that his wife had made 300 obscene videos, which was rejected by the top court. Chief Justice SA Bobde and Justice A.S. Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian told the counsel for the petitioner that his client is a cruel person and he should not expect any relief from the court.

The counsel for the petitioner replied that his client was not cruel and had not committed any cruelty. The bench said that his wife has called him cruel in her complaint. The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife.

[(File Photo: IANS)]

Know Supreme Court’s comment

The counsel for the petitioner claimed that the wife has allegedly made ‘300 TikTok videos’ which are obscene. To this the bench said, “It does not mean that a man should inflict any kind of cruelty on his wife. Even if he has done so, you will not misbehave with her.”

Said – If I did not want to live together, I would have got divorced

The counsel for the petitioner insisted for relief in the matter. The Chief Justice replied, “You would have divorced him, if you cannot live together, there is no need for cruelty.” The counsel for the petitioner submitted that there was no need for custodial interrogation in the matter. However, the bench replied that it did not agree with the contention of the petitioner, and referred to the FIR lodged by the husband against the wife. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that the FIR registered against his client was one-sided. The Chief Justice replied that FIRs are always one-sided and he has never seen a joint FIR filed by both the parties.

anticipatory bail plea rejected

The counsel for the petitioner urged the court to consider granting anticipatory bail to his client in the matter. Dismissing the matter, the apex court said, “The anticipatory bail plea is dismissed.”


The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife, which was rejected

New Delhi, March 5 (IANS)| The Supreme Court on Friday refused to grant anticipatory bail to a man who has been accused of cruelty to his wife. The man, in his defense, claimed that his wife had made 300 obscene videos, which was rejected by the top court. Chief Justice SA Bobde and Justice A.S. Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian told the counsel for the petitioner that his client is a cruel person and he should not expect any relief from the court.

The counsel for the petitioner replied that his client was not cruel and had not committed any cruelty. The bench said that his wife has called him cruel in her complaint. The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife.

[(File Photo: IANS)]

Know Supreme Court’s comment

The counsel for the petitioner claimed that the wife has allegedly made ‘300 TikTok videos’ which are obscene. To this the bench said, “It does not mean that a man should inflict any kind of cruelty on his wife. Even if he has done so, you will not misbehave with her.”

Said – If I did not want to live together, I would have got divorced

The counsel for the petitioner insisted for relief in the matter. The Chief Justice replied, “You would have divorced him, if you cannot live together, there is no need for cruelty.” The counsel for the petitioner submitted that there was no need for custodial interrogation in the matter. However, the bench replied that it did not agree with the contention of the petitioner, and referred to the FIR lodged by the husband against the wife. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that the FIR registered against his client was one-sided. The Chief Justice replied that FIRs are always one-sided and he has never seen a joint FIR filed by both the parties.

anticipatory bail plea rejected

The counsel for the petitioner urged the court to consider granting anticipatory bail to his client in the matter. Dismissing the matter, the apex court said, “The anticipatory bail plea is dismissed.”


The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife, which was rejected

New Delhi, March 5 (IANS)| The Supreme Court on Friday refused to grant anticipatory bail to a man who has been accused of cruelty to his wife. The man, in his defense, claimed that his wife had made 300 obscene videos, which was rejected by the top court. Chief Justice SA Bobde and Justice A.S. Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian told the counsel for the petitioner that his client is a cruel person and he should not expect any relief from the court.

The counsel for the petitioner replied that his client was not cruel and had not committed any cruelty. The bench said that his wife has called him cruel in her complaint. The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife.

[(File Photo: IANS)]

Know Supreme Court’s comment

The counsel for the petitioner claimed that the wife has allegedly made ‘300 TikTok videos’ which are obscene. To this the bench said, “It does not mean that a man should inflict any kind of cruelty on his wife. Even if he has done so, you will not misbehave with her.”

Said – If I did not want to live together, I would have got divorced

The counsel for the petitioner insisted for relief in the matter. The Chief Justice replied, “You would have divorced him, if you cannot live together, there is no need for cruelty.” The counsel for the petitioner submitted that there was no need for custodial interrogation in the matter. However, the bench replied that it did not agree with the contention of the petitioner, and referred to the FIR lodged by the husband against the wife. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that the FIR registered against his client was one-sided. The Chief Justice replied that FIRs are always one-sided and he has never seen a joint FIR filed by both the parties.

anticipatory bail plea rejected

The counsel for the petitioner urged the court to consider granting anticipatory bail to his client in the matter. Dismissing the matter, the apex court said, “The anticipatory bail plea is dismissed.”


The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife, which was rejected

New Delhi, March 5 (IANS)| The Supreme Court on Friday refused to grant anticipatory bail to a man who has been accused of cruelty to his wife. The man, in his defense, claimed that his wife had made 300 obscene videos, which was rejected by the top court. Chief Justice SA Bobde and Justice A.S. Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian told the counsel for the petitioner that his client is a cruel person and he should not expect any relief from the court.

The counsel for the petitioner replied that his client was not cruel and had not committed any cruelty. The bench said that his wife has called him cruel in her complaint. The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife.

[(File Photo: IANS)]

Know Supreme Court’s comment

The counsel for the petitioner claimed that the wife has allegedly made ‘300 TikTok videos’ which are obscene. To this the bench said, “It does not mean that a man should inflict any kind of cruelty on his wife. Even if he has done so, you will not misbehave with her.”

Said – If I did not want to live together, I would have got divorced

The counsel for the petitioner insisted for relief in the matter. The Chief Justice replied, “You would have divorced him, if you cannot live together, there is no need for cruelty.” The counsel for the petitioner submitted that there was no need for custodial interrogation in the matter. However, the bench replied that it did not agree with the contention of the petitioner, and referred to the FIR lodged by the husband against the wife. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that the FIR registered against his client was one-sided. The Chief Justice replied that FIRs are always one-sided and he has never seen a joint FIR filed by both the parties.

anticipatory bail plea rejected

The counsel for the petitioner urged the court to consider granting anticipatory bail to his client in the matter. Dismissing the matter, the apex court said, “The anticipatory bail plea is dismissed.”


The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife, which was rejected

New Delhi, March 5 (IANS)| The Supreme Court on Friday refused to grant anticipatory bail to a man who has been accused of cruelty to his wife. The man, in his defense, claimed that his wife had made 300 obscene videos, which was rejected by the top court. Chief Justice SA Bobde and Justice A.S. Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian told the counsel for the petitioner that his client is a cruel person and he should not expect any relief from the court.

The counsel for the petitioner replied that his client was not cruel and had not committed any cruelty. The bench said that his wife has called him cruel in her complaint. The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife.

[(File Photo: IANS)]

Know Supreme Court’s comment

The counsel for the petitioner claimed that the wife has allegedly made ‘300 TikTok videos’ which are obscene. To this the bench said, “It does not mean that a man should inflict any kind of cruelty on his wife. Even if he has done so, you will not misbehave with her.”

Said – If I did not want to live together, I would have got divorced

The counsel for the petitioner insisted for relief in the matter. The Chief Justice replied, “You would have divorced him, if you cannot live together, there is no need for cruelty.” The counsel for the petitioner submitted that there was no need for custodial interrogation in the matter. However, the bench replied that it did not agree with the contention of the petitioner, and referred to the FIR lodged by the husband against the wife. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that the FIR registered against his client was one-sided. The Chief Justice replied that FIRs are always one-sided and he has never seen a joint FIR filed by both the parties.

anticipatory bail plea rejected

The counsel for the petitioner urged the court to consider granting anticipatory bail to his client in the matter. Dismissing the matter, the apex court said, “The anticipatory bail plea is dismissed.”


The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife, which was rejected

New Delhi, March 5 (IANS)| The Supreme Court on Friday refused to grant anticipatory bail to a man who has been accused of cruelty to his wife. The man, in his defense, claimed that his wife had made 300 obscene videos, which was rejected by the top court. Chief Justice SA Bobde and Justice A.S. Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian told the counsel for the petitioner that his client is a cruel person and he should not expect any relief from the court.

The counsel for the petitioner replied that his client was not cruel and had not committed any cruelty. The bench said that his wife has called him cruel in her complaint. The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife.

[(File Photo: IANS)]

Know Supreme Court’s comment

The counsel for the petitioner claimed that the wife has allegedly made ‘300 TikTok videos’ which are obscene. To this the bench said, “It does not mean that a man should inflict any kind of cruelty on his wife. Even if he has done so, you will not misbehave with her.”

Said – If I did not want to live together, I would have got divorced

The counsel for the petitioner insisted for relief in the matter. The Chief Justice replied, “You would have divorced him, if you cannot live together, there is no need for cruelty.” The counsel for the petitioner submitted that there was no need for custodial interrogation in the matter. However, the bench replied that it did not agree with the contention of the petitioner, and referred to the FIR lodged by the husband against the wife. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that the FIR registered against his client was one-sided. The Chief Justice replied that FIRs are always one-sided and he has never seen a joint FIR filed by both the parties.

anticipatory bail plea rejected

The counsel for the petitioner urged the court to consider granting anticipatory bail to his client in the matter. Dismissing the matter, the apex court said, “The anticipatory bail plea is dismissed.”

ShareTweetShareSendSend

Related Posts

If you still have Rs 2000 notes left after today, then know what to do with them.

If you still have Rs 2000 notes left after today, then know what to do with them.

01/10/2023
2

India’s Aditi Ashok created history by winning silver medal in the golf competition of Asian Games, for the first time the country got a medal in this event.

01/10/2023
1
virat kohli and anushka sharma

Virat Kohli is going to become a father again?, Anushka Sharma is also excited about the little guest!

01/10/2023
7
sukhpal singh khaira 2

Sukhpal Singh Khera again attacked, Congress leader sent to judicial custody for 14 days

01/10/2023
6

RecentNews

  • All
  • Latest News
If you still have Rs 2000 notes left after today, then know what to do with them.

If you still have Rs 2000 notes left after today, then know what to do with them.

01/10/2023
2

India’s Aditi Ashok created history by winning silver medal in the golf competition of Asian Games, for the first time the country got a medal in this event.

01/10/2023
1
virat kohli and anushka sharma

Virat Kohli is going to become a father again?, Anushka Sharma is also excited about the little guest!

01/10/2023
7
sukhpal singh khaira 2

Sukhpal Singh Khera again attacked, Congress leader sent to judicial custody for 14 days

01/10/2023
6
Satta King 30 Sept: The lock of luck of people with these numbers opened in Satta King on 30 September, know what were the winning numbers of Gali, Disawar, Faridabad etc.?

Satta King 30 Sept: The lock of luck of people with these numbers opened in Satta King on 30 September, know what were the winning numbers of Gali, Disawar, Faridabad etc.?

01/10/2023
5

POPULAR STORIES

  • Amidst the leaked MMS scandal, another video of Anjali Arora is becoming increasingly viral, the senses will be blown away.

    Another video of Anjali Arora is becoming increasingly viral, the senses will be blown away.

    241 shares
    Share 96 Tweet 60
  • World Archery Para Championships: Para archer Pooja Jaatyan creates history by winning silver medal, the first Indian to do so

    665 shares
    Share 266 Tweet 166
  • Cricket: Australia ready for tri-series with India-Pakistan, supports Rameez Raja’s proposal

    1150 shares
    Share 460 Tweet 288
  • ‘Article 370 issue cannot be reduced to ’emotional majoritarian interpretation’ of the Constitution’, argues Kapil Sibal

    23 shares
    Share 9 Tweet 6
  • Ukraine Russia War: Alipov, the new Ambassador of Russia to India, discusses the safety of Indian students trapped in Ukraine

    9 shares
    Share 4 Tweet 2
anytvnews logo

AnyTV News is the news magazine, which brings the most reliable, authentic and unbiased news to its dedicated readership.

READ MORE »

Recent Posts

  • If you still have Rs 2000 notes left after today, then know what to do with them.
  • India’s Aditi Ashok created history by winning silver medal in the golf competition of Asian Games, for the first time the country got a medal in this event.
  • Virat Kohli is going to become a father again?, Anushka Sharma is also excited about the little guest!

Categories

  • Automobiles
  • Business
  • DIY
  • Education
  • Entertainment
  • Gadgets
  • Health
  • India
  • Internet
  • Latest News
  • Lifestyle
  • Mobile
  • Opinion
  • Politics
  • Regional
  • Sports
  • Technology
  • Top News
  • Uncategorized
  • Viral News
  • World
  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
  • Contact Us

© 2023 AnyTV News

No Result
View All Result
  • Latest News
    • India
    • Regional
    • World
  • Top News
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Technology
    • Mobile
    • Gadgets
    • Internet
  • Lifestyle
  • Health
  • Automobiles
  • Education
  • Viral News
  • Web Stories

© 2023 AnyTV News

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
Go to mobile version