The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife, which was rejected
New Delhi, March 5 (IANS)| The Supreme Court on Friday refused to grant anticipatory bail to a man who has been accused of cruelty to his wife. The man, in his defense, claimed that his wife had made 300 obscene videos, which was rejected by the top court. Chief Justice SA Bobde and Justice A.S. Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian told the counsel for the petitioner that his client is a cruel person and he should not expect any relief from the court.
The counsel for the petitioner replied that his client was not cruel and had not committed any cruelty. The bench said that his wife has called him cruel in her complaint. The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife.
[(File Photo: IANS)]
Know Supreme Court’s comment
The counsel for the petitioner claimed that the wife has allegedly made ‘300 TikTok videos’ which are obscene. To this the bench said, “It does not mean that a man should inflict any kind of cruelty on his wife. Even if he has done so, you will not misbehave with her.”
Said – If I did not want to live together, I would have got divorced
The counsel for the petitioner insisted for relief in the matter. The Chief Justice replied, “You would have divorced him, if you cannot live together, there is no need for cruelty.” The counsel for the petitioner submitted that there was no need for custodial interrogation in the matter. However, the bench replied that it did not agree with the contention of the petitioner, and referred to the FIR lodged by the husband against the wife. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that the FIR registered against his client was one-sided. The Chief Justice replied that FIRs are always one-sided and he has never seen a joint FIR filed by both the parties.
anticipatory bail plea rejected
The counsel for the petitioner urged the court to consider granting anticipatory bail to his client in the matter. Dismissing the matter, the apex court said, “The anticipatory bail plea is dismissed.”
The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife, which was rejected
New Delhi, March 5 (IANS)| The Supreme Court on Friday refused to grant anticipatory bail to a man who has been accused of cruelty to his wife. The man, in his defense, claimed that his wife had made 300 obscene videos, which was rejected by the top court. Chief Justice SA Bobde and Justice A.S. Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian told the counsel for the petitioner that his client is a cruel person and he should not expect any relief from the court.
The counsel for the petitioner replied that his client was not cruel and had not committed any cruelty. The bench said that his wife has called him cruel in her complaint. The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife.
[(File Photo: IANS)]
Know Supreme Court’s comment
The counsel for the petitioner claimed that the wife has allegedly made ‘300 TikTok videos’ which are obscene. To this the bench said, “It does not mean that a man should inflict any kind of cruelty on his wife. Even if he has done so, you will not misbehave with her.”
Said – If I did not want to live together, I would have got divorced
The counsel for the petitioner insisted for relief in the matter. The Chief Justice replied, “You would have divorced him, if you cannot live together, there is no need for cruelty.” The counsel for the petitioner submitted that there was no need for custodial interrogation in the matter. However, the bench replied that it did not agree with the contention of the petitioner, and referred to the FIR lodged by the husband against the wife. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that the FIR registered against his client was one-sided. The Chief Justice replied that FIRs are always one-sided and he has never seen a joint FIR filed by both the parties.
anticipatory bail plea rejected
The counsel for the petitioner urged the court to consider granting anticipatory bail to his client in the matter. Dismissing the matter, the apex court said, “The anticipatory bail plea is dismissed.”
The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife, which was rejected
New Delhi, March 5 (IANS)| The Supreme Court on Friday refused to grant anticipatory bail to a man who has been accused of cruelty to his wife. The man, in his defense, claimed that his wife had made 300 obscene videos, which was rejected by the top court. Chief Justice SA Bobde and Justice A.S. Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian told the counsel for the petitioner that his client is a cruel person and he should not expect any relief from the court.
The counsel for the petitioner replied that his client was not cruel and had not committed any cruelty. The bench said that his wife has called him cruel in her complaint. The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife.
[(File Photo: IANS)]
Know Supreme Court’s comment
The counsel for the petitioner claimed that the wife has allegedly made ‘300 TikTok videos’ which are obscene. To this the bench said, “It does not mean that a man should inflict any kind of cruelty on his wife. Even if he has done so, you will not misbehave with her.”
Said – If I did not want to live together, I would have got divorced
The counsel for the petitioner insisted for relief in the matter. The Chief Justice replied, “You would have divorced him, if you cannot live together, there is no need for cruelty.” The counsel for the petitioner submitted that there was no need for custodial interrogation in the matter. However, the bench replied that it did not agree with the contention of the petitioner, and referred to the FIR lodged by the husband against the wife. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that the FIR registered against his client was one-sided. The Chief Justice replied that FIRs are always one-sided and he has never seen a joint FIR filed by both the parties.
anticipatory bail plea rejected
The counsel for the petitioner urged the court to consider granting anticipatory bail to his client in the matter. Dismissing the matter, the apex court said, “The anticipatory bail plea is dismissed.”
The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife, which was rejected
New Delhi, March 5 (IANS)| The Supreme Court on Friday refused to grant anticipatory bail to a man who has been accused of cruelty to his wife. The man, in his defense, claimed that his wife had made 300 obscene videos, which was rejected by the top court. Chief Justice SA Bobde and Justice A.S. Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian told the counsel for the petitioner that his client is a cruel person and he should not expect any relief from the court.
The counsel for the petitioner replied that his client was not cruel and had not committed any cruelty. The bench said that his wife has called him cruel in her complaint. The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife.
[(File Photo: IANS)]
Know Supreme Court’s comment
The counsel for the petitioner claimed that the wife has allegedly made ‘300 TikTok videos’ which are obscene. To this the bench said, “It does not mean that a man should inflict any kind of cruelty on his wife. Even if he has done so, you will not misbehave with her.”
Said – If I did not want to live together, I would have got divorced
The counsel for the petitioner insisted for relief in the matter. The Chief Justice replied, “You would have divorced him, if you cannot live together, there is no need for cruelty.” The counsel for the petitioner submitted that there was no need for custodial interrogation in the matter. However, the bench replied that it did not agree with the contention of the petitioner, and referred to the FIR lodged by the husband against the wife. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that the FIR registered against his client was one-sided. The Chief Justice replied that FIRs are always one-sided and he has never seen a joint FIR filed by both the parties.
anticipatory bail plea rejected
The counsel for the petitioner urged the court to consider granting anticipatory bail to his client in the matter. Dismissing the matter, the apex court said, “The anticipatory bail plea is dismissed.”
The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife, which was rejected
New Delhi, March 5 (IANS)| The Supreme Court on Friday refused to grant anticipatory bail to a man who has been accused of cruelty to his wife. The man, in his defense, claimed that his wife had made 300 obscene videos, which was rejected by the top court. Chief Justice SA Bobde and Justice A.S. Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian told the counsel for the petitioner that his client is a cruel person and he should not expect any relief from the court.
The counsel for the petitioner replied that his client was not cruel and had not committed any cruelty. The bench said that his wife has called him cruel in her complaint. The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife.
[(File Photo: IANS)]
Know Supreme Court’s comment
The counsel for the petitioner claimed that the wife has allegedly made ‘300 TikTok videos’ which are obscene. To this the bench said, “It does not mean that a man should inflict any kind of cruelty on his wife. Even if he has done so, you will not misbehave with her.”
Said – If I did not want to live together, I would have got divorced
The counsel for the petitioner insisted for relief in the matter. The Chief Justice replied, “You would have divorced him, if you cannot live together, there is no need for cruelty.” The counsel for the petitioner submitted that there was no need for custodial interrogation in the matter. However, the bench replied that it did not agree with the contention of the petitioner, and referred to the FIR lodged by the husband against the wife. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that the FIR registered against his client was one-sided. The Chief Justice replied that FIRs are always one-sided and he has never seen a joint FIR filed by both the parties.
anticipatory bail plea rejected
The counsel for the petitioner urged the court to consider granting anticipatory bail to his client in the matter. Dismissing the matter, the apex court said, “The anticipatory bail plea is dismissed.”
The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife, which was rejected
New Delhi, March 5 (IANS)| The Supreme Court on Friday refused to grant anticipatory bail to a man who has been accused of cruelty to his wife. The man, in his defense, claimed that his wife had made 300 obscene videos, which was rejected by the top court. Chief Justice SA Bobde and Justice A.S. Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian told the counsel for the petitioner that his client is a cruel person and he should not expect any relief from the court.
The counsel for the petitioner replied that his client was not cruel and had not committed any cruelty. The bench said that his wife has called him cruel in her complaint. The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife.
[(File Photo: IANS)]
Know Supreme Court’s comment
The counsel for the petitioner claimed that the wife has allegedly made ‘300 TikTok videos’ which are obscene. To this the bench said, “It does not mean that a man should inflict any kind of cruelty on his wife. Even if he has done so, you will not misbehave with her.”
Said – If I did not want to live together, I would have got divorced
The counsel for the petitioner insisted for relief in the matter. The Chief Justice replied, “You would have divorced him, if you cannot live together, there is no need for cruelty.” The counsel for the petitioner submitted that there was no need for custodial interrogation in the matter. However, the bench replied that it did not agree with the contention of the petitioner, and referred to the FIR lodged by the husband against the wife. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that the FIR registered against his client was one-sided. The Chief Justice replied that FIRs are always one-sided and he has never seen a joint FIR filed by both the parties.
anticipatory bail plea rejected
The counsel for the petitioner urged the court to consider granting anticipatory bail to his client in the matter. Dismissing the matter, the apex court said, “The anticipatory bail plea is dismissed.”
The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife, which was rejected
New Delhi, March 5 (IANS)| The Supreme Court on Friday refused to grant anticipatory bail to a man who has been accused of cruelty to his wife. The man, in his defense, claimed that his wife had made 300 obscene videos, which was rejected by the top court. Chief Justice SA Bobde and Justice A.S. Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian told the counsel for the petitioner that his client is a cruel person and he should not expect any relief from the court.
The counsel for the petitioner replied that his client was not cruel and had not committed any cruelty. The bench said that his wife has called him cruel in her complaint. The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife.
[(File Photo: IANS)]
Know Supreme Court’s comment
The counsel for the petitioner claimed that the wife has allegedly made ‘300 TikTok videos’ which are obscene. To this the bench said, “It does not mean that a man should inflict any kind of cruelty on his wife. Even if he has done so, you will not misbehave with her.”
Said – If I did not want to live together, I would have got divorced
The counsel for the petitioner insisted for relief in the matter. The Chief Justice replied, “You would have divorced him, if you cannot live together, there is no need for cruelty.” The counsel for the petitioner submitted that there was no need for custodial interrogation in the matter. However, the bench replied that it did not agree with the contention of the petitioner, and referred to the FIR lodged by the husband against the wife. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that the FIR registered against his client was one-sided. The Chief Justice replied that FIRs are always one-sided and he has never seen a joint FIR filed by both the parties.
anticipatory bail plea rejected
The counsel for the petitioner urged the court to consider granting anticipatory bail to his client in the matter. Dismissing the matter, the apex court said, “The anticipatory bail plea is dismissed.”
The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife, which was rejected
New Delhi, March 5 (IANS)| The Supreme Court on Friday refused to grant anticipatory bail to a man who has been accused of cruelty to his wife. The man, in his defense, claimed that his wife had made 300 obscene videos, which was rejected by the top court. Chief Justice SA Bobde and Justice A.S. Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian told the counsel for the petitioner that his client is a cruel person and he should not expect any relief from the court.
The counsel for the petitioner replied that his client was not cruel and had not committed any cruelty. The bench said that his wife has called him cruel in her complaint. The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife.
[(File Photo: IANS)]
Know Supreme Court’s comment
The counsel for the petitioner claimed that the wife has allegedly made ‘300 TikTok videos’ which are obscene. To this the bench said, “It does not mean that a man should inflict any kind of cruelty on his wife. Even if he has done so, you will not misbehave with her.”
Said – If I did not want to live together, I would have got divorced
The counsel for the petitioner insisted for relief in the matter. The Chief Justice replied, “You would have divorced him, if you cannot live together, there is no need for cruelty.” The counsel for the petitioner submitted that there was no need for custodial interrogation in the matter. However, the bench replied that it did not agree with the contention of the petitioner, and referred to the FIR lodged by the husband against the wife. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that the FIR registered against his client was one-sided. The Chief Justice replied that FIRs are always one-sided and he has never seen a joint FIR filed by both the parties.
anticipatory bail plea rejected
The counsel for the petitioner urged the court to consider granting anticipatory bail to his client in the matter. Dismissing the matter, the apex court said, “The anticipatory bail plea is dismissed.”
The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife, which was rejected
New Delhi, March 5 (IANS)| The Supreme Court on Friday refused to grant anticipatory bail to a man who has been accused of cruelty to his wife. The man, in his defense, claimed that his wife had made 300 obscene videos, which was rejected by the top court. Chief Justice SA Bobde and Justice A.S. Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian told the counsel for the petitioner that his client is a cruel person and he should not expect any relief from the court.
The counsel for the petitioner replied that his client was not cruel and had not committed any cruelty. The bench said that his wife has called him cruel in her complaint. The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife.
[(File Photo: IANS)]
Know Supreme Court’s comment
The counsel for the petitioner claimed that the wife has allegedly made ‘300 TikTok videos’ which are obscene. To this the bench said, “It does not mean that a man should inflict any kind of cruelty on his wife. Even if he has done so, you will not misbehave with her.”
Said – If I did not want to live together, I would have got divorced
The counsel for the petitioner insisted for relief in the matter. The Chief Justice replied, “You would have divorced him, if you cannot live together, there is no need for cruelty.” The counsel for the petitioner submitted that there was no need for custodial interrogation in the matter. However, the bench replied that it did not agree with the contention of the petitioner, and referred to the FIR lodged by the husband against the wife. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that the FIR registered against his client was one-sided. The Chief Justice replied that FIRs are always one-sided and he has never seen a joint FIR filed by both the parties.
anticipatory bail plea rejected
The counsel for the petitioner urged the court to consider granting anticipatory bail to his client in the matter. Dismissing the matter, the apex court said, “The anticipatory bail plea is dismissed.”
The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife, which was rejected
New Delhi, March 5 (IANS)| The Supreme Court on Friday refused to grant anticipatory bail to a man who has been accused of cruelty to his wife. The man, in his defense, claimed that his wife had made 300 obscene videos, which was rejected by the top court. Chief Justice SA Bobde and Justice A.S. Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian told the counsel for the petitioner that his client is a cruel person and he should not expect any relief from the court.
The counsel for the petitioner replied that his client was not cruel and had not committed any cruelty. The bench said that his wife has called him cruel in her complaint. The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife.
[(File Photo: IANS)]
Know Supreme Court’s comment
The counsel for the petitioner claimed that the wife has allegedly made ‘300 TikTok videos’ which are obscene. To this the bench said, “It does not mean that a man should inflict any kind of cruelty on his wife. Even if he has done so, you will not misbehave with her.”
Said – If I did not want to live together, I would have got divorced
The counsel for the petitioner insisted for relief in the matter. The Chief Justice replied, “You would have divorced him, if you cannot live together, there is no need for cruelty.” The counsel for the petitioner submitted that there was no need for custodial interrogation in the matter. However, the bench replied that it did not agree with the contention of the petitioner, and referred to the FIR lodged by the husband against the wife. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that the FIR registered against his client was one-sided. The Chief Justice replied that FIRs are always one-sided and he has never seen a joint FIR filed by both the parties.
anticipatory bail plea rejected
The counsel for the petitioner urged the court to consider granting anticipatory bail to his client in the matter. Dismissing the matter, the apex court said, “The anticipatory bail plea is dismissed.”
The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife, which was rejected
New Delhi, March 5 (IANS)| The Supreme Court on Friday refused to grant anticipatory bail to a man who has been accused of cruelty to his wife. The man, in his defense, claimed that his wife had made 300 obscene videos, which was rejected by the top court. Chief Justice SA Bobde and Justice A.S. Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian told the counsel for the petitioner that his client is a cruel person and he should not expect any relief from the court.
The counsel for the petitioner replied that his client was not cruel and had not committed any cruelty. The bench said that his wife has called him cruel in her complaint. The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife.
[(File Photo: IANS)]
Know Supreme Court’s comment
The counsel for the petitioner claimed that the wife has allegedly made ‘300 TikTok videos’ which are obscene. To this the bench said, “It does not mean that a man should inflict any kind of cruelty on his wife. Even if he has done so, you will not misbehave with her.”
Said – If I did not want to live together, I would have got divorced
The counsel for the petitioner insisted for relief in the matter. The Chief Justice replied, “You would have divorced him, if you cannot live together, there is no need for cruelty.” The counsel for the petitioner submitted that there was no need for custodial interrogation in the matter. However, the bench replied that it did not agree with the contention of the petitioner, and referred to the FIR lodged by the husband against the wife. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that the FIR registered against his client was one-sided. The Chief Justice replied that FIRs are always one-sided and he has never seen a joint FIR filed by both the parties.
anticipatory bail plea rejected
The counsel for the petitioner urged the court to consider granting anticipatory bail to his client in the matter. Dismissing the matter, the apex court said, “The anticipatory bail plea is dismissed.”
The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife, which was rejected
New Delhi, March 5 (IANS)| The Supreme Court on Friday refused to grant anticipatory bail to a man who has been accused of cruelty to his wife. The man, in his defense, claimed that his wife had made 300 obscene videos, which was rejected by the top court. Chief Justice SA Bobde and Justice A.S. Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian told the counsel for the petitioner that his client is a cruel person and he should not expect any relief from the court.
The counsel for the petitioner replied that his client was not cruel and had not committed any cruelty. The bench said that his wife has called him cruel in her complaint. The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife.
[(File Photo: IANS)]
Know Supreme Court’s comment
The counsel for the petitioner claimed that the wife has allegedly made ‘300 TikTok videos’ which are obscene. To this the bench said, “It does not mean that a man should inflict any kind of cruelty on his wife. Even if he has done so, you will not misbehave with her.”
Said – If I did not want to live together, I would have got divorced
The counsel for the petitioner insisted for relief in the matter. The Chief Justice replied, “You would have divorced him, if you cannot live together, there is no need for cruelty.” The counsel for the petitioner submitted that there was no need for custodial interrogation in the matter. However, the bench replied that it did not agree with the contention of the petitioner, and referred to the FIR lodged by the husband against the wife. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that the FIR registered against his client was one-sided. The Chief Justice replied that FIRs are always one-sided and he has never seen a joint FIR filed by both the parties.
anticipatory bail plea rejected
The counsel for the petitioner urged the court to consider granting anticipatory bail to his client in the matter. Dismissing the matter, the apex court said, “The anticipatory bail plea is dismissed.”
The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife, which was rejected
New Delhi, March 5 (IANS)| The Supreme Court on Friday refused to grant anticipatory bail to a man who has been accused of cruelty to his wife. The man, in his defense, claimed that his wife had made 300 obscene videos, which was rejected by the top court. Chief Justice SA Bobde and Justice A.S. Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian told the counsel for the petitioner that his client is a cruel person and he should not expect any relief from the court.
The counsel for the petitioner replied that his client was not cruel and had not committed any cruelty. The bench said that his wife has called him cruel in her complaint. The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife.
[(File Photo: IANS)]
Know Supreme Court’s comment
The counsel for the petitioner claimed that the wife has allegedly made ‘300 TikTok videos’ which are obscene. To this the bench said, “It does not mean that a man should inflict any kind of cruelty on his wife. Even if he has done so, you will not misbehave with her.”
Said – If I did not want to live together, I would have got divorced
The counsel for the petitioner insisted for relief in the matter. The Chief Justice replied, “You would have divorced him, if you cannot live together, there is no need for cruelty.” The counsel for the petitioner submitted that there was no need for custodial interrogation in the matter. However, the bench replied that it did not agree with the contention of the petitioner, and referred to the FIR lodged by the husband against the wife. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that the FIR registered against his client was one-sided. The Chief Justice replied that FIRs are always one-sided and he has never seen a joint FIR filed by both the parties.
anticipatory bail plea rejected
The counsel for the petitioner urged the court to consider granting anticipatory bail to his client in the matter. Dismissing the matter, the apex court said, “The anticipatory bail plea is dismissed.”
The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife, which was rejected
New Delhi, March 5 (IANS)| The Supreme Court on Friday refused to grant anticipatory bail to a man who has been accused of cruelty to his wife. The man, in his defense, claimed that his wife had made 300 obscene videos, which was rejected by the top court. Chief Justice SA Bobde and Justice A.S. Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian told the counsel for the petitioner that his client is a cruel person and he should not expect any relief from the court.
The counsel for the petitioner replied that his client was not cruel and had not committed any cruelty. The bench said that his wife has called him cruel in her complaint. The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife.
[(File Photo: IANS)]
Know Supreme Court’s comment
The counsel for the petitioner claimed that the wife has allegedly made ‘300 TikTok videos’ which are obscene. To this the bench said, “It does not mean that a man should inflict any kind of cruelty on his wife. Even if he has done so, you will not misbehave with her.”
Said – If I did not want to live together, I would have got divorced
The counsel for the petitioner insisted for relief in the matter. The Chief Justice replied, “You would have divorced him, if you cannot live together, there is no need for cruelty.” The counsel for the petitioner submitted that there was no need for custodial interrogation in the matter. However, the bench replied that it did not agree with the contention of the petitioner, and referred to the FIR lodged by the husband against the wife. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that the FIR registered against his client was one-sided. The Chief Justice replied that FIRs are always one-sided and he has never seen a joint FIR filed by both the parties.
anticipatory bail plea rejected
The counsel for the petitioner urged the court to consider granting anticipatory bail to his client in the matter. Dismissing the matter, the apex court said, “The anticipatory bail plea is dismissed.”
The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife, which was rejected
New Delhi, March 5 (IANS)| The Supreme Court on Friday refused to grant anticipatory bail to a man who has been accused of cruelty to his wife. The man, in his defense, claimed that his wife had made 300 obscene videos, which was rejected by the top court. Chief Justice SA Bobde and Justice A.S. Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian told the counsel for the petitioner that his client is a cruel person and he should not expect any relief from the court.
The counsel for the petitioner replied that his client was not cruel and had not committed any cruelty. The bench said that his wife has called him cruel in her complaint. The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife.
[(File Photo: IANS)]
Know Supreme Court’s comment
The counsel for the petitioner claimed that the wife has allegedly made ‘300 TikTok videos’ which are obscene. To this the bench said, “It does not mean that a man should inflict any kind of cruelty on his wife. Even if he has done so, you will not misbehave with her.”
Said – If I did not want to live together, I would have got divorced
The counsel for the petitioner insisted for relief in the matter. The Chief Justice replied, “You would have divorced him, if you cannot live together, there is no need for cruelty.” The counsel for the petitioner submitted that there was no need for custodial interrogation in the matter. However, the bench replied that it did not agree with the contention of the petitioner, and referred to the FIR lodged by the husband against the wife. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that the FIR registered against his client was one-sided. The Chief Justice replied that FIRs are always one-sided and he has never seen a joint FIR filed by both the parties.
anticipatory bail plea rejected
The counsel for the petitioner urged the court to consider granting anticipatory bail to his client in the matter. Dismissing the matter, the apex court said, “The anticipatory bail plea is dismissed.”
The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife, which was rejected
New Delhi, March 5 (IANS)| The Supreme Court on Friday refused to grant anticipatory bail to a man who has been accused of cruelty to his wife. The man, in his defense, claimed that his wife had made 300 obscene videos, which was rejected by the top court. Chief Justice SA Bobde and Justice A.S. Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian told the counsel for the petitioner that his client is a cruel person and he should not expect any relief from the court.
The counsel for the petitioner replied that his client was not cruel and had not committed any cruelty. The bench said that his wife has called him cruel in her complaint. The man from Rajasthan had moved the apex court seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR lodged by his wife.
[(File Photo: IANS)]
Know Supreme Court’s comment
The counsel for the petitioner claimed that the wife has allegedly made ‘300 TikTok videos’ which are obscene. To this the bench said, “It does not mean that a man should inflict any kind of cruelty on his wife. Even if he has done so, you will not misbehave with her.”
Said – If I did not want to live together, I would have got divorced
The counsel for the petitioner insisted for relief in the matter. The Chief Justice replied, “You would have divorced him, if you cannot live together, there is no need for cruelty.” The counsel for the petitioner submitted that there was no need for custodial interrogation in the matter. However, the bench replied that it did not agree with the contention of the petitioner, and referred to the FIR lodged by the husband against the wife. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that the FIR registered against his client was one-sided. The Chief Justice replied that FIRs are always one-sided and he has never seen a joint FIR filed by both the parties.
anticipatory bail plea rejected
The counsel for the petitioner urged the court to consider granting anticipatory bail to his client in the matter. Dismissing the matter, the apex court said, “The anticipatory bail plea is dismissed.”
